I am also disappointed by today's announcement primarily because I now need to figure out an alternative solution. I probably would have been better off skipping the one-time purchase, but I'll count the excellent customer service that I have received as paid support. I've worked on calendaring and syncing services before so I can understand why supporting the new MobileMe calendars would be a major undertaking that's not worth it if our use case is in the minority, and isn't a major selling feature of Spanning Sync.
On Apr 18, 3:45 am, kastorff <[email protected]> wrote: > I bought a > lifetime license (2 actually) in the product's early days because of what > Spanning Sync did, not because of where my data was stored, or what Apple > was doing, or Google was doing. Spanning Sync fixed things. It was the > middle man who made it all work. It enabled me to have what I wanted: > bidirectional sync between Apple's calendaring solution and Google's > calendaring solution. Now you say choose. If I wanted to choose, frankly, > I'd never have needed Spanning Sync. I get to go from elegant to worrying > about whether a calendar is hosted locally or not. > > http://blog.spanningsync.com/2011/04/update-spanning-sync-and-the-new... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Spanning Sync" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en.
