Hi Matt and Dominik, thank you for replay.

As I understand data have 4 scanfilters: 1) negative with lockmass, 2)
negative raw, 3) positive with lockmass, and 4) positive raw.

Functions 1 and 3 are corrected to lockmass signal (no like in
Water's, just lock scans ), and 2,4 raw data.

 {1;1} refers to the first scan method defined in the experiment
(positive mode in this example), and {1;2} is the second scan method
(ie negative mode in this case).

filterLine="FTMS {1;1}  + p ESI Full ms [60.00-1200.00]"
filterLine="FTMS {1;2}  - p ESI Full ms [60.00-1200.00]" - negative
polarity, profile mode, electrospray ionisation, raw ms (not corrected
for lockmasses).

I just checked out FilterLine.cpp code, and actually I was not able to
figure out where exactly problem can occur, but I am not a software
coder.

Dominik, yes we tried to use RecalOfline, but also in this case
"msLevel" and "polarity" are set wrong.

Thank you and best regards,
-- 
Andris Jankevics
AIO
Groningen Bioinformatics Centre
Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute
University of Groningen
Kerklaan 30, Haren, 9751 NN, The Netherlands


On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Matt Chambers
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Andris,
>
> ReAdW gets the ms level and polarity from the filter line, but in this
> case it doesn't know how to deal with the filter line so it seems to be
> silently aborting the filter parser. The "extra coding and hassle"
> should happen to the parser code instead of your own code (IMO). But in
> this case, I'm not even sure what the elements of the scan filter mean.
> What is {1;1}? What is "lock" vs. "MZ"? Is that like Waters's lock mass?
>
> -Matt

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to