=======================================================
-> This is The 'SPORRS' Mailing List
-> Info File: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/infosporrs.htm
-> Note: Remember to include your name in each list post or reply.
-> Please delete all unnecessary quoted text from the original message!
=======================================================

Robert Palmer wrote:

> His initial
> attempts to contact customer service have resulted in the expected
> response: "Were sorry...Here's a few free rolls of film and mailers.
> Goodbye".  He'd really like to pursue this further and have the error
> acknowledged by someone other than the first line of defense at customer
> service.  Any contacts or suggestions ?

I have a question, then a suggestion based on personal processing
experience.

Logically, what gain would be realized by pursuing the matter even if
someone did acknowledge the errors?  There is no guarantee that this
particular person will see to it that all of your future film is processed
correctly, or that they will even be working wherever it was that your film
was sent in a week or a month or a year.  Correct?  And the film was
already damaged.  I have learned that mail-order communication cannot be
personal.  That is one reason that it is discounted and that they put that
little liability disclaimer on all of the mailer envelopes relieving
themselves from any responsibility if something as small as a roll of film
gets misplaced or damaged within their big high volume operation.  They
know that mailers are used by those who are very cost conscious, and for
which low cost is the primary priority (like when you have a choice, as
with E-6 films, the type which you have mentioned here).  Because of this
cost decision, they do not realistically expect to provide any type of
customer service for the $3 - $5 that you are paying per roll.  Most of
their 'processing' cost covers processing your film through their corporate
operation, not just the chemicals.  The math just doesn't work otherwise. 
Mail-order consumer labs are just that.  They don't expect you to send them
critical and potentially valuable film for them to process in their system.
 You may get better mail-order quality with a more professionally geared
lab like A&I, but there is still the potential for a distant communication
problem if an error occurs.  That's unavoidable without over-the-counter
service (which labs like A&I do offer also, if you walk in the door).

Only one suggestion: In order to have any type of relationship with a lab
that is beneficial to keeping the processing quality of your film monitored
and under control, I have found that you must be able to walk in the door,
talk to them and show them what you want in order to get it, or you will
have little or no control over what happens to your film during processing.
 This primary reason and the benefit of completely eliminating any
potential loss from postal service and courier exposure by dropping off and
picking up my film myself, often in the same day, is why I was forced to
cease using mailers.  My film and images are worth too much to me to trust
them to volume mail-order processing with high employee turnover and low
employee concern for someone that they never met or will meet.  Is it
really worth that extra $2 savings to play the 'processing lottery'?  I
know some of us have burned up more than $2 in frustration trying to
control a lab in a distant city, run by a faceless voice on the other end
of a long distance phone call.  When they hang up the phone, where does
your little problem fit into their day?

I find it much easier to find a local lab that specializes in what you
want: Film processed correctly, consistently and reliably every time, with
the added benefit of a local relationship when communication is necessary.

When I'm shooting, I know I couldn't stay concentrated on producing quality
images each time if I was worried each time about whether the roll in the
camera would be the processing error film or not.  Cheap piece of mind. 
Remember the original message poster said he was using E-6 here.  I
personally would never send E-6 out to a mail-order lab.

You guys can go back to your naps now...

Dave Cohen
Photographer, Member ASMP
Action Photographic Webmaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/home/



=======================================================
-> SPORRS: 'Serious Photographers Of Railroad Related Subjects'
-> Web Site: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/
-> Message © 1998 SPORRS® - All Rights Reserved
=======================================================


Reply via email to