Thanks.. I didn't see it either but I wanted to see if there were other opinions/options.
David T Williams - Lead MEP/FP Engineer LHB, Inc. | PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf Of Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 1:59 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Cc: Bob Knight <b...@firebyknight.com> Subject: RE: Attic/Concealed space access to sprinkler heads NFPA 25 does not require the inspection of sprinklers in concealed spaces, so that should not be an issue. Thank you, Bob Knight, CET III Fire by Knight, LLC 208-318-3057 From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of David Williams via Sprinklerforum Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 12:43 PM To: email@example.com<mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: David Williams Subject: Attic/Concealed space access to sprinkler heads I have a project intended to be fully sprinkled with a combustible attic that tapers from 2' to 4 ' without being filled to within 2 inches of the deck with insulation. So I am planning on a dry pipe system with standard heads as the design of the attic does not allow the effective use of special application attic sprinklers. The questions are: whether inspection access is required to be provided, is it prudent to do so at the heads, or can the locations just be noted on the gypsum mounted to the bottom chord of the open web trusses. TIA David T Williams, PE - Lead MEP/FP Engineer 21 West Superior Street, Suite 500, Duluth, MN 55802 Direct 218.279.2436 | Cell 218.310.2446 LHBcorp.com<http://www.LHBcorp.com> LHB, Inc. | PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN.
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org