I concur with Dr Tluds points and think in particular Dr Belonio, Dr. Nurhuda 
and Paul Oliver all seem to have stoves that could easily be poised to go 
commercial big time. They seem  to work beautifully,  are physically good 
looking and are close to good fuel sources. In addition they are located in 
places where industrial and mechanical means of manufature exist.
Not all of the rest of the world is so fortunate. While these stoves are 
relatively economical obtaining them is another issue. While a stove could be 
worth $25.00 $50.00 or even maybe $100.00 having to pay $200.00 $300 or $400.00 
to obtain a sample for testing is beyond practicality. No matter what efforts 
are expended tincanium and hammered tin has little appeal here. In these day of 
ipads and iphones style is a major hurdle.

Lurking in the backgound at the end of the earth.

Michael N Trevor
Marshall Islands 

.  

  From: Paul Anderson 
  To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves 
  Cc: Otto Formo 
  Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 11:28 PM
  Subject: [Stoves] Specifics about advancement of TLUD stoves Re: fan 
expertise?


  Dear all,   This is a different and more specific reply to Otto's message.

  I see four things that will greatly advance the position of micro-gasifier 
stoves, specifically the TLUD stoves.   I am working on all four of them.

  1.  Prove that stove users will accept TLUD gasifier stoves (at reasonable 
price, but this is not about price.) and (with a reasonable supply chain for 
appropriate fuels, but this is not about fuels) :  

  We lack meaningful studies that show that TLUD stoves (when available and 
with fuels available) are accepted by "typical" cookstove users in any 
significant segment of the population.   We need some documentation that xx 
number of TLUD users (out of yy number of households that seriously tried TLUD 
stoves) are still using the stoves zz percent of the time for their cooking, 
and this is over time periods that are checked again and again each few months. 
   Comments from users should be reported.

  Start small, and do it well.   The money for the bigger studies will follow 
success with the small numbers.    This is NOT about sales.   This is about 
sustained usage.

  We are working on this topic at Awamu in Uganda with the Quad TLUD stove, but 
no results to report at this time.    Is anyone else doing such studies?

  2.  Compilation of past results and further data collection about emissions 
and efficiencies of TLUD stoves.  Some TLUD have had major success.   And 
others "suck".   Which ones and why?   We seek data from the stove testing 
centers.   We also will do further work at Stove Camps in the coming 3 months.

  3.  Prove the capacities to produce sufficient numbers of TLUD stoves with 
excellent functioning.   The response must be credible for numbers of many 10s 
of thousands for stoves per year.   20 tinsmiths seated in a factory is not 
sufficient proof.   Prof. Nurhuda has shown that metal stamping can produce his 
TLUD stoves with good quality.   I do not doubt that capacity worldwide could 
be sufficient when demand is there, but with the goal of creating in-country 
jobs, for most situations "proof" is still not in hand.

  4.  Bring the price below US$10 for the low-end products that are still 
functional about emissions and efficiencies.    I am working on this and I hope 
to report about it at the July stove camp at Aprovecho where TLUD stoves are a 
focal issue.

  Note that I did NOT add on having different TLUD stoves such as the ones with 
fans like Ron is discussing.   When they become available, that will be 
wonderful.  But then such stoves will still need to be considered regarding # 1 
and #2 and #3 above.   They might be the breakthrough for gaining acceptance, 
or lower emissions, or whatever.

  Paul


Paul S. Anderson, PhD  aka "Dr TLUD"
Email:  [email protected]   Skype: paultlud  Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website:  www.drtlud.comOn 5/26/2013 2:46 AM, Otto Formo wrote:

    Ron
     
    I do not see any point in arguing with all and anybody, to try to convince 
them , that gasifing of biomass are here to BE and will develop more rapidly, 
than anyone ever belived.
     
    What about the issue of biomass as fuel?
    Here are a LOT of challanges in preparation, production, handeling etc.
     
    Paul A and Ron, 
    If, "Open Source", realy means something to you, then create a group of 
"belivers" and start from there.
     
    Thanks.
     
    Otto
     


----------------------------------------------------------------------------






------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Stoves mailing list

  to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
  [email protected]

  to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
  
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

  for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
  http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 3184/6358 - Release Date: 05/25/13
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to