I am with Dennis on this.  I would agree.  I also always find it interesting
that we can never find an intelligent, educated, saavy and "bound to stay"
Minnesotan to take on this job.  I feel that we should always, bottom line,
hire a Minnesotan.

Pamela Ellison
Como Park
Saint Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis Tester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "M Charles Swope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [StPaul] Superintendent's Compensation


> What a racket.  This musical chairs game being played by a handfull of
small
> city school superintendents, where every couple of years they leave for a
> better deal, creating an opening for another one of their ilk to milk the
> locals for an even bigger sweatheart contract, is one of the reasons
> taxpayers have such low regard for the entire public education fiasco.  My
2
> cents.
>
>
>
> Dennis Tester
> Mac-Groveland
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "M Charles Swope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 8:58 AM
> Subject: [StPaul] Superintendent's Compensation
>
>
> > The StarTrib today published the details of four
> > school superintendents' contracts. Superintendent
> > Harvey's contract stands out in a couple of areas.
> > http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/5143838.html
> > http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/5143842.html
> > http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/5143834.html
> > http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/5143844.html
> >
> > For instance, her bonuses are labeled "longevity"
> > bonuses while the other superintendents either get  no
> > bonuses or get "performance" bonuses. Now, this MAY be
> > just a matter of semantics. There's no detail given
> > for how "performance" is measured. It may be that it
> > means the same thing as "longevity." That is, unless
> > you've performed so badly that you should be fired,
> > your "performance" merits a bonus.
> >
> > Another interesting area is in sick pay. All the
> > superintendents are allowed to accumulate sick pay
> > and, when they leave, be paid for at least some of
> > their unused sick days. However, Superintendent Harvey
> > will get paid for TWICE the number of unused sick days
> > when she leaves.
> >
> > Coming from private industry where pay for unused sick
> > days is, perhaps not unheard of, but certainly
> > uncommon, I've never understood why anyone gets paid
> > for unused sick days. But I've never heard, even in
> > the public sector, of anyone getting paid DOUBLE for
> > unused sick days. And this is not an insignificant sum
> > of money. Depending on how many sick days are declared
> > while she's working, this provision will add a five
> > figure amount to the Superintendent's compensation
> > when she leaves.
> >
> > Now, it may be that Pat Harvey deserves every penny
> > that she's going to get under this contract. The
> > consensus seems to be that she's doing a good job. But
> > some of the provisions in her contract are certainly
> > unusual, both on their face and in comparison to the
> > other area superintendents.
> >
> > Charlie Swope
> > Ward 1
> >
> > _____________________________________________
> > To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> > Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ____________________________________________
> > NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
> > http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
> >
> > Archive Address:
> >   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
>
> _____________________________________________
> To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
> Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ____________________________________________
> NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
> http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
>
> Archive Address:
>    http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/
>

_____________________________________________
To Join:   St. Paul Issues Forum Rules Discussion
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to