I think you would benefit from reading the article by Alicia Colon that I 
posted earlier. You're certainly as anxious as other anti-Catholic itch 
scratchers to get out the long knives at every opportunity.

> dear oh dear
> 
> as a cultural roman catholic dragged up in the 'latin church' i am just old  
> enough to have learnt mass in latin it is
> a thing about power .. there are all these people who have had their  
> ability to enjoy life robbed from them
> and it is not a small number
> you have ask why did all these "kiddie fiddlers" join closed communities  
> that gave them access to innocents
> 
> and why if there was an issue they just got moved from parish to parish to  
> continue in their immature practices
> 
> why people have had to live their lives condemned to suffering a guilt  
> while the persons who violated them continue quite happily protected by the  
> church
> 
> and the status quo
> 
> i think that is what people are indignant about
> some people are strange and lets say unhealthy but an institution that  
> would rather protect their abuse upon choir boys than regulate
> that behaviour and punish it is just absurd
> 
> how anyone can support it is beyond me
> 
> i am all for the church as a thing that can bring the community together  
> but if they would rather turn a blind eye to perpetrators
> 
> and predators with in their ranks than admit the lifestyle they offer  
> attracts those who are deviant
> 
> i don't think it is so much that some priests were odd and did awful things  
> i think it is that they are protected
> 
> and their behaviour is hidden and they aren't educated and told that it is  
> morally wrong to take advantage of a young person
> 
> instead of being censored theyaremove to a new parish with lots of fresh  
> opportunities
> 
> and they hope that no one ad heard of their complusions
> 
> outside the church they would have had to face up to their 'stuff' and grow  
> up
> 
> i have two thoughts
> 
> a. how must it feel to a victim [to be forever unsafe ]
> 
> b. and how must it feel to a perpetrator [to be forever safe ]
> 
> frankly it is unconscionable
> 
> some one said something about it wasn't so bad cause they were adolescents
> 
> to my mind that is even worse ...... an adult can destroy any prospect for  
> a happy life
> 
> in one act of self indulgence and to be able to just move on
> 
> it is just plain icky
> 
> 
> On 03/11/2010 2:02am, [email protected] wrote:
> > Three of the founders were Catholic, so they couldn't have been too  
> > worried about Catholicism in Canada.
> 
> 
> 
> > http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html>
> 
> 
> 
> > Besides, the Continental Congress and the army under George Washington  
> > tried to gain the friendship of Canadian Catholics. Somehow, that doesn't  
> > sound so threatening.
> 
> 
> 
> > It's more likely that the founders were concerned about the political  
> > affiliation of Canadian Catholics than their religion as you suggest.
> 
> 
> 
> > But even if the founders were anti-Catholic, that itch you scratch  
> > doesn't bother Catholics that much. They'd probably just pray for you.
> 
> 
> 
> > > informing you that you are wrong
> 
> 
> 
> > That doesn't exactly narrow things down.
> 
> 
> 
> > Three of the founders were Catholic, so they couldn't have been too  
> > worried about Canadian Catholics.
> 
> > http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html>
> 
> 
> 
> > In fact, George Washington was intent upon
> 
> > >
> 
> > > On 11/2/10 8:44 AM, Francis Drouillard wrote:
> 
> > > > Other than petty sniping, what is your point?
> 
> > > >
> 
> > > > On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:17 PM, M Christol wrote:
> 
> > > >
> 
> > > >>>>> Some folks just have to scratch that anti-Catholic itch.
> 
> > > >>>> Like the founding fathers?
> 
> > > >>> Most were deeply religious and most were students of Cicero and  
> > Natural Law, neither of which is particularly anti-Catholic.
> 
> > > >>>
> 
> > > >> And, yet, they found Canada's Catholic support very threatening.
> 
> > >
> 
> > > --
> 
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> > Groups "StrataList-OT" group.
> 
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> 
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
> > [email protected].
> 
> > > For more options, visit this group at  
> > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
> 
> > >
> 
> > >
> 
> 
> 
> > Francis Drouillard, PE
> 
> > Novato, CA 94945
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > --
> 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> > Groups "StrataList-OT" group.
> 
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to  
> > [email protected].
> 
> > For more options, visit this group at  
> > http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "StrataList-OT" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
> 
> 
> 

Francis Drouillard, PE
Novato, CA 94945


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"StrataList-OT" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.

Reply via email to