looks like i need to make a fresh batch of chupalube™ for frank's constant irritations....
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Francis Drouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's see, this thread started as a complaint by John D regarding my > numerous threads. > > Then M Christol asked about where I stood on Prop. 19. That's when > richardsan, in an attempt to assuage his anti-catholic itch, pointed out > (incorrectly) that "katho-licks" would likely oppose then measure, then > provided a link to a catholic site that took no position on Prop 19 (or any > other CA proposition for that matter.) > their leaders are asking them to not partake, frank... > > richardsan didn't take kindly to such criticism, and changed the subject to > that of priests that molested children. > we'll, having just watched some educational programming about the catholic league of decency, i think they have even more to answer to. errr...ot means what it says... > Prior to that post, there were 8 posts. Since that anti-catholic post by > richardsan, there have been 29 posts on the thread. > > Most of those participating in the public scratching of their anti-catholic > itch refuse to acknowledge that pedophilia rates among priests are much > lower than in the general population, while their rates of homosexual > attraction to young males is about the same as in the general population. > you're the only fella who subscribes to that myopic opinion. and it really doesn't have any thing to do with pedophilia rates among priests/police/architects or anyone else...you refuse to accept, that the church has tried in vain to keep this under wraps for decades. maybe your itchiness is due to that. > > Those with the anti-Catholic itch then built strawmen to make their to > justify their continued public scratching, some going so far as to imply or > state that Catholics approved of the reprehensible behavior by a few bad > priests when nothing of the sort was ever claimed by me or any Catholics > that I know. > i am a former catholic... that means at some point, i woke up from a decade and a half of the stupor of indoctrination and brainwashing and made choices to clean myself up. > None of you anti-Catholics seem to oppose NAMBLA, so I guess you all > support the goals and activities of that group. lmao...adult parasites come in many flavours frank. the worst of them are the conservative, republican, family values heroes who are nothing short of the most hypocritical pedophiles on earth. > Nor do any of you seem too upset by pedophiles being released from prison, > often with the caveat that they don't live near schools or parks used by > children, although little is done to enforce those caveats. > murderers, thieves, rapists, robbers, embezzlers...all sorts get out of jail after serving some or all of their punishments....what's your point? > I don't even believe most of you care that much about child molestation. that's only an opinion not based in fact...you aren't entitled to make up your own facts, frank. You'd be just as happy turning a blind eye to it once again after the issue > is used to demolish a very good, but imperfect, religios institution. > good? no. imperfect?...undoubtedly... > I'd say I hope you have that itch forever, but I don't think any of you are > really looking for a cure! > > a cure?...did he say...a cure? you mean like a cure for the gay? -- "doubts are the only certainties i have left." m. feldman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "StrataList-OT" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/stratalist-ot?hl=en.
