On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Matt Raible wrote:

> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:38:02 -0700
> From: Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Velocity vs. JSP: objective tests?
> See comments below...
> > yeah, no offense intended to David Johnson, but that's a
> > really poor way to use Velocity.  it looks as though that
> > method is intended to spit out some HTML hardcoded into
> > whatever $macros is or some such thing.  the HTML shouldn't
> > come from the java, it should be in the template to begin
> > with, or at least defined the global Velocimacro library.
> > that way the code could just be:
> >
> > #showNavBar( true)
> >
> > anyway, i hope i'm not coming off too argumentative, it's
> > just that these are poor examples of using velocity.  i
> > wouldn't want people to get the wrong idea. :)
> As I am a committer on the Roller project - I'm curious to know what a
> better way of implementing this would be.  We do want Roller to be a
> best-practices examples - so any advice is appreciated!

It would also be an interesting experiment to see how people would
approach this with JSP (and probably using Tiles for the standard layout

> Thanks,
> Matt


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to