It's hard to answer this generally. Meso and miro are different models so there will be many situations in which they produce different results. You first have to figure out whether the sumo flow is too low (e.g. due to road nework problems) or whether the the meso flow is too high (which can be due to the used options). There is no meso option called tl-logic (but there is one for tls and one for junction control) so you need to be more precise on the used option.
regards, Jakob Am Mi., 29. Mai 2019 um 07:47 Uhr schrieb rony gracious <[email protected] >: > For the same flow sumo is taking around 2 hours of extra simulated time > then meso which accounts for this extra counts. > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:02 AM rony gracious <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> While I run meso for a 5 hour simulation with loop detectors placed there >> is a considerable difference in vehicle count from when I do the same with >> sumo. When I took vehicle count every 30 minutes meso had atleast 100 >> vehicles more than sumo in each time step of 30 minutes. >> >> Can anyone tell me why that is and how I can get more closer to a sumo >> SIM with meso. The only parameters I am using is mesosim true and meso tl >> logic true which is in mesoscopic. >> >> Rony Gracious >> > _______________________________________________ > sumo-user mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user >
_______________________________________________ sumo-user mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
