On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:02:33AM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On 4 Aug 2004, at 20:03, Toad wrote: > > >On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:01:22PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > >>While I am no fan of the Induce Act, I should point out that from my > >>reading of the Induce Act, Freenet would *probably* be safe as none of > >>its features are expressly intended to allow people to infringe > >>copyright law (this is merely a side-effect of Freenet's actual goal). > > > >Umm, and clasical P2P systems don't have noninfringing uses? > > No, but may of them have features which their creators have (foolishly) > admitted are directly intended to thwart the efforts of copyright > holders to enforce copyright law.
LOL. Whereas we don't? ;) > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
