On 1999-12-01 Pippi said:
>If your applications have 16 bit versions, I'd say yes. I ran win3.
>1 for a while before switching. I switched for the toys and for
>icq, but I was able to use my lexmark, to surf just fine, to do
>mail, process graphics and write with a good word processor (wp6.1)
>and it performed nicely. I had troubles when I accidently
>downloaded 32 bit applications or files with long file names. I
>like w9x better for the chrome, bells and whistles, but I wouldn't
>say it performs any better. win3.11 multitasks just fine, too.
This has been my thinking. WP 6.1 for Win 3.11 meets my word-processing
needs just fine--especially when one considers that I still like WP 5.1 for
DOS. The chrome, bells, and whistles are nice--but hardly necessary in a
setup such I have.
Regards,
David Ball
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Net-Tamer V 1.11.2 - Test Drive
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
