What a quaint notion. "Geneva convention, and who knowswhat else, that prohibit attacking citizens, public infrastructure, utilities.."
G wrote: >>But I don't understand what is wrong with considering >>all options in war. This one was (wisely) discarded. >>Maybe it should not have made it up the to the >>president (ie been shot down at a lower level). Had he >>gone through with it, then yes, very bad decision. But >>in the context of how can we win/be successful with >>Bush'es Iraq adventure, I am all for creative and >>comprehensive thinking. And I am all for eliminating >>bone headed ideas from that list. To a casual >>observer, it looks like that is exactly what happened. >> >>So what am I missing? >> >>thanks >>Tom >> >> >> >I'm no expert, but it seems to me that there are agreements with >countries around the world, like the Geneva convention, and who knows >what else, that prohibit attacking citizens, public infrastructure, >utilities.. > >I'm sure that someone more knowledgeable will chime in. > > > _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
