On donderdag 28 juli 2016 21:51 Marc Gemis wrote: > Some background: the natural=water, water = x was proposed by Zverik. > His idea was to make it easy for mappers using aerial imagery to map > anything "water"-like with natural=water, eventually someone would add > the water=x detail. x, can be pond, stream, river, canal, oxbow, etc. > etc. [1] carto-css (the standard rendering can handle this tagging > scheme without problems). > > Recently someone was complaining about this use for bassins. [2] > > [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water > [2] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-June/076144.html
In the thread that followed several points for both sides have been made. Reading the full thread on talk, I don't feel like fixing the Leie any more. I will just try to solve the render issues and then leave it be. OSM's free tagging is one of it's strengths, but also one of it's biggest disadvantages. -- Dit bericht is ondertekend met OpenPGP.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
