Hi Marck, PMFJI ...
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:56:57 +0000 Marck D Pearlstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BF>> Well, any message is just a carrier for your encapsulated text, BF>> isn't it? Yet your text appears in the preview pane, right? BF>> Your comment makes it sound like the digest parts are somehow BF>> encoded and not plain text. MDP> But they are encoded - as separate messages, each of which can be MDP> separately replied to and handled if wanted. The text that appears MDP> in the preview pane is the message body. Always. Nothing else MDP> appears in the preview pane. Seconded. I don't think anything but the acutual _message body_ should be present in primary preview pane. MDP> I say don't let anything else in there .. it will only confuse. ACK. MDP> Maybe Stef can come up with something that will satisfy - who knows? I MDP> can't think of something that fits the TB methodology. Maybe it would be sufficient to show the attachments of type "message/rfc-822" in additional tabs, as it is done with a HTML part, attachments of type "text/plain", images and so on. This would at least allow to read the messages w/o opening the virtual folder. Of course it would be difficult to make "Reply" or "Forward" act as it does in a virtual folder when viewing a attached message this way, but than you still have the "virtual folder" to handle it as a "native message that behaves as if it had hit your Inbox the usual way". Just my 0.02 (choose a currency by yourself) ... -- Pit ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
