I had a look at the current tags <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!tags/tiddlywiki>. They are a bit of a mess.
There is overlap. Misspelling. One-offs that are redundant. Tags with too much specificity. A few really obscure ones. Overall there are too many for a reference point IMO. I guess the issue is whether the tags list should be a finite moderated set or allowed to be a mashup? The ones available when you create a post are the most important. Ad-hoc user created ones should not be on that list. My feeling is for a core set of moderated, but allow more that are not. I'm not if GG can do that balancing act? Effective taggery that works to capture "all-but-only" effectively is a real art. My 2 cents TT On Monday, 9 December 2019 19:23:47 UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > > > Go to the main TiddlyWiki GG page. Over on the right hand side it says > "tags". Click on the link and it will take you to a page with all of the > tags displayed. > > On Monday, December 9, 2019 at 9:53:38 AM UTC-8, TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> That is partly about documenting them though (note: I can't find a simple >> way to find them all on GG). >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4a1a565f-c696-4b7c-9721-55a3ce258d77%40googlegroups.com.
