Ciao Walt ludwa6 wrote:
> Charlie, TT et al: Much as I do like these multi-pane views for NoteMAKING > in TW, this is not what one wants for NoteTAKING, as I see it Right. Charlie's example is, I think, a *good* proof-of-concept for end-users who COGNITIVELY "PRE-SLICE", i.e. know in ADVANCE where the chips should land. There are many people whose dominant cognitive style is that. You & me are probably not one of them! :-) Only when this job of NoteTAKING is finished do i want to think about > NoteMAKING; that is when i value the many affordances that TW brings to the > challenge of integrating this new material into my preexisting web of > deeply intertwingled ideas. This is the problem-space/ opportunity zone > where i think development effort would do best to focus: interoperability, > versus trying to be all things to all users. > RIGHT! There are a few things I can say here. 1. EMERGENT MAKES (i.e. "Creating"* not *"Recording") of as yet not fully-formed ideas and notes need a different approach. 2. As a start, actually about a year ago Mark S. & BTC gave some very good workable ideas on this ... 3. ... the idea was to use MARKUP in an existing Tiddler of a TAKE that will auto-create a link to a MAKE that, once actually created becomes a transclusion. I think it was a very powerful idea. I did not have time to fully play with it. 4. ... Let me know if that sounds interesting & I'll see if I can find the thread that has the code. Basically I think you are on the right track pursuing this stuff! And is doable in TW. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/36132934-079e-4cd0-8b0f-9f13679c1e81n%40googlegroups.com.
