@David I have been keeping my eye on the Subsume threads and this plugin may be what I'm looking for. Between my naiveté of TW and, for the moment, a rather nebulous pedagogical project, I am not convinced I know what I'm asking, but I appreciate the reply nonetheless.
@ Mark S. You are correct. More often than not, there IS too much material and I my intent is not to add more to an already dense curriculum. I see systems thinking as pedagogical strategy/framework for my teaching. (Systems thinking in chemical education is new to me and to chemical education for that matter.) I do not yet know what content I may have to sacrifice to use this pedagogy, nor if the loss of this content compromises the learning objectives of the course(s). I am hoping to figure all this out in a public facing TW using these concept outlines as a knowledge base. On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 2:04:41 PM UTC-4 Mark S. wrote: > The official slicer edition does pretty much what you describe > https://tiddlywiki.com/editions/text-slicer/ . > But it uses a complicated relationship between the resulting tiddlers that > may be difficult to manipulate. > > Notowritey (https://marxsal.github.io/various/notowritey.html) allows you > to split large texts using a regular expression. You can then manipulate > items into a hierarchical arrangement in a manner similar to a regular > outliner. The relationship is based on simple listing and tagging. > > I would imagine for a systems approach, you would have to add a great deal > more of material. What I remember about chemistry is that they already give > you too much material to remember and often assume you are familiar with > processes and techniques that you have never encountered anywhere. As if > someone just ripped pages out of your textbook and threw them away. Trying > to see how you could fit MORE into the curriculum seems somewhat unkind. > > Another Mark > > On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 10:06:42 AM UTC-7 mark.cu...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> I have been using Soren’s Grok TiddlyWiki and his Zettelkasten shell over >> the last several weeks. Most of this time has been just getting stuff into >> TW and seeing what happens (or doesn't and trying to figure out why). I >> have not spent any time creating, connecting, etc.. The product of my work >> thus far is here. >> >> I have two large outlines (GeneralChemistryACCMOutline and >> OrganicChemistryACCMOutline) that delineate anchoring concept content >> maps <https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed300049w> for most of the >> undergraduate chemistry I teach. The hierarchy of these outlines is >> identical at Level 1 (Big Ideas) and Level 2 (Enduring Understandings) and >> differ at Level 3 (Subdisciplinary Articulations) and Level 4 (Content >> Details). >> >> I need to excise these outlines and then add open educational resources >> (text, links to videos, images, and simulations, exercises, etc.) to the >> resulting tiddlers. >> >> I am interested in your thoughts on how I might excise these outlines in >> a (unique?) way that leverages TW’s utility/flexibility as a >> content-management system considering: >> >> 1. The order of Level 1 Big Ideas is consistent with the sequence of >> instruction. >> 2. I would like to somehow leverage TW and the connected, >> context-free facts derived from these outlines to move away from a >> reductionist approach to teaching and learning to a systems approach >> <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41570-018-0126> to teaching and >> learning. >> 3. I do not yet know specifically how I am going to use this resource >> in a teaching setting. >> 4. I am new to TW… >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> Mark >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/793e6ad4-26b4-4e64-aa37-15312db21e61n%40googlegroups.com.
