The --unpackplugin takes the name of the tiddler, not of the JSON file (just delete ".json" from your unpackplugin command).
It looks like after you're done you'll need to do some cleanup, moving subsume/plugins/subsume to plugins/subsume, and deleting the subsume directory. On Friday, July 23, 2021 at 7:51:08 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > Thanks for the help. I exported the $:/plugins/giffmex/subsume as a .json > file and it yields $__plugins_giffmex_subsume.json. > > In the terminal: > > tiddlywiki --load "$__plugins_giffmex_subsume.json" --unpackplugin > "$:/plugins/giffmex/subsume.json" --savewikifolder "subsume" > > and I get: > > Error: No tiddlers found in file ".json" > > What am I missing? > On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 4:36:56 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote: > >> Mark you can save a plugin tiddler as a folder: >> https://links.tiddlywiki.com/urls/4b5e9c4afc6923035ef9/ >> >> Otherwise you can drag and drop the plugin to your wiki and import it and >> it will work, though it will only be installed for that specific wiki to >> which you dragged it. >> >> On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 9:57:01 PM UTC+2 [email protected] >> wrote: >> >>> @David >>> Is there a plugin folder to download. I'm not convinced I know how to >>> install your plugin otherwise. I'm running TW via Node.js. >>> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 3:44:45 PM UTC-4 Mark Cubberley wrote: >>> >>>> @David >>>> I have been keeping my eye on the Subsume threads and this plugin may >>>> be what I'm looking for. Between my naiveté of TW and, for the moment, a >>>> rather nebulous pedagogical project, I am not convinced I know what I'm >>>> asking, but I appreciate the reply nonetheless. >>>> >>>> @ Mark S. >>>> You are correct. More often than not, there IS too much material and I >>>> my intent is not to add more to an already dense curriculum. I see systems >>>> thinking as pedagogical strategy/framework for my teaching. (Systems >>>> thinking in chemical education is new to me and to chemical education for >>>> that matter.) I do not yet know what content I may have to sacrifice to >>>> use >>>> this pedagogy, nor if the loss of this content compromises the learning >>>> objectives of the course(s). I am hoping to figure all this out in a >>>> public >>>> facing TW using these concept outlines as a knowledge base. >>>> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 2:04:41 PM UTC-4 Mark S. wrote: >>>> >>>>> The official slicer edition does pretty much what you describe >>>>> https://tiddlywiki.com/editions/text-slicer/ . >>>>> But it uses a complicated relationship between the resulting tiddlers >>>>> that may be difficult to manipulate. >>>>> >>>>> Notowritey (https://marxsal.github.io/various/notowritey.html) allows >>>>> you to split large texts using a regular expression. You can then >>>>> manipulate items into a hierarchical arrangement in a manner similar to a >>>>> regular outliner. The relationship is based on simple listing and tagging. >>>>> >>>>> I would imagine for a systems approach, you would have to add a great >>>>> deal more of material. What I remember about chemistry is that they >>>>> already >>>>> give you too much material to remember and often assume you are familiar >>>>> with processes and techniques that you have never encountered anywhere. >>>>> As >>>>> if someone just ripped pages out of your textbook and threw them away. >>>>> Trying to see how you could fit MORE into the curriculum seems somewhat >>>>> unkind. >>>>> >>>>> Another Mark >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 10:06:42 AM UTC-7 [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have been using Soren’s Grok TiddlyWiki and his Zettelkasten shell >>>>>> over the last several weeks. Most of this time has been just getting >>>>>> stuff >>>>>> into TW and seeing what happens (or doesn't and trying to figure out >>>>>> why). >>>>>> I have not spent any time creating, connecting, etc.. The product of my >>>>>> work thus far is here. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have two large outlines (GeneralChemistryACCMOutline and >>>>>> OrganicChemistryACCMOutline) that delineate anchoring concept >>>>>> content maps <https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed300049w> for most >>>>>> of the undergraduate chemistry I teach. The hierarchy of these outlines >>>>>> is >>>>>> identical at Level 1 (Big Ideas) and Level 2 (Enduring Understandings) >>>>>> and >>>>>> differ at Level 3 (Subdisciplinary Articulations) and Level 4 (Content >>>>>> Details). >>>>>> >>>>>> I need to excise these outlines and then add open educational >>>>>> resources (text, links to videos, images, and simulations, exercises, >>>>>> etc.) >>>>>> to the resulting tiddlers. >>>>>> >>>>>> I am interested in your thoughts on how I might excise these outlines >>>>>> in a (unique?) way that leverages TW’s utility/flexibility as a >>>>>> content-management system considering: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. The order of Level 1 Big Ideas is consistent with the sequence >>>>>> of instruction. >>>>>> 2. I would like to somehow leverage TW and the connected, >>>>>> context-free facts derived from these outlines to move away from a >>>>>> reductionist approach to teaching and learning to a systems >>>>>> approach <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41570-018-0126> to >>>>>> teaching and learning. >>>>>> 3. I do not yet know specifically how I am going to use this >>>>>> resource in a teaching setting. >>>>>> 4. I am new to TW… >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your help. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mark >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d40e4e34-f531-446b-80c1-293fd347c1f1n%40googlegroups.com.
