Thanks for the help. I exported the $:/plugins/giffmex/subsume as a .json 
file and it yields $__plugins_giffmex_subsume.json. 

In the terminal: 

tiddlywiki --load "$__plugins_giffmex_subsume.json" --unpackplugin 
"$:/plugins/giffmex/subsume.json" --savewikifolder "subsume"

and I get:

Error: No tiddlers found in file ".json"

What am I missing?
On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 4:36:56 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:

> Mark you can save a plugin tiddler as a folder: 
> https://links.tiddlywiki.com/urls/4b5e9c4afc6923035ef9/
>
> Otherwise you can drag and drop the plugin to your wiki and import it and 
> it will work, though it will only be installed for that specific wiki to 
> which you dragged it.
>
> On Thursday, July 22, 2021 at 9:57:01 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> @David
>> Is there a plugin folder to download. I'm not convinced I know how to 
>> install your plugin otherwise. I'm running TW via Node.js.
>> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 3:44:45 PM UTC-4 Mark Cubberley wrote:
>>
>>> @David
>>> I have been keeping my eye on the Subsume threads and this plugin may be 
>>> what I'm looking for. Between my naiveté of TW and, for the moment, a 
>>> rather nebulous pedagogical project, I am not convinced I know what I'm 
>>> asking, but I appreciate the reply nonetheless.
>>>
>>> @ Mark S.
>>> You are correct. More often than not, there IS too much material and I 
>>> my intent is not to add more to an already dense curriculum. I see systems 
>>> thinking as pedagogical strategy/framework for my teaching. (Systems 
>>> thinking in chemical education is new to me and to chemical education for 
>>> that matter.) I do not yet know what content I may have to sacrifice to use 
>>> this pedagogy, nor if the loss of this content compromises the learning 
>>> objectives of the course(s). I am hoping to figure all this out in a public 
>>> facing TW using these concept outlines as a knowledge base.
>>> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 2:04:41 PM UTC-4 Mark S. wrote:
>>>
>>>> The official slicer edition does pretty much what you describe 
>>>> https://tiddlywiki.com/editions/text-slicer/ .
>>>> But it uses a complicated relationship between the resulting tiddlers 
>>>> that may be difficult to manipulate.
>>>>
>>>> Notowritey (https://marxsal.github.io/various/notowritey.html) allows 
>>>> you to split large texts using a regular expression. You can then 
>>>> manipulate items into a hierarchical arrangement in a manner similar to a 
>>>> regular outliner. The relationship is based on simple listing and tagging.
>>>>
>>>> I would imagine for a systems approach, you would have to add a great 
>>>> deal more of material. What I remember about chemistry is that they 
>>>> already 
>>>> give you too much material to remember and often assume you are familiar 
>>>> with processes and techniques that you have never encountered anywhere. As 
>>>> if someone just ripped pages out of your textbook and threw them away. 
>>>> Trying to see how you could fit MORE into the curriculum seems somewhat 
>>>> unkind.
>>>>
>>>> Another Mark
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 at 10:06:42 AM UTC-7 [email protected] 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have been using Soren’s Grok TiddlyWiki and his Zettelkasten shell 
>>>>> over the last several weeks. Most of this time has been just getting 
>>>>> stuff 
>>>>> into TW and seeing what happens (or doesn't and trying to figure out 
>>>>> why). 
>>>>> I have not spent any time creating, connecting, etc.. The product of my 
>>>>> work thus far is here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have two large outlines (GeneralChemistryACCMOutline and 
>>>>> OrganicChemistryACCMOutline) that delineate anchoring concept content 
>>>>> maps <https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ed300049w> for most of the 
>>>>> undergraduate chemistry I teach. The hierarchy of these outlines is 
>>>>> identical at Level 1 (Big Ideas) and Level 2 (Enduring Understandings) 
>>>>> and 
>>>>> differ at Level 3 (Subdisciplinary Articulations) and Level 4 (Content 
>>>>> Details).
>>>>>
>>>>> I need to excise these outlines and then add open educational 
>>>>> resources (text, links to videos, images, and simulations, exercises, 
>>>>> etc.) 
>>>>> to the resulting tiddlers.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am interested in your thoughts on how I might excise these outlines 
>>>>> in a (unique?) way that leverages TW’s utility/flexibility as a 
>>>>> content-management system considering:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. The order of Level 1 Big Ideas is consistent with the sequence 
>>>>>    of instruction.
>>>>>    2. I would like to somehow leverage TW and the connected, 
>>>>>    context-free facts derived from these outlines to move away from a 
>>>>>    reductionist approach to teaching and learning to a systems 
>>>>>    approach <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41570-018-0126> to 
>>>>>    teaching and learning. 
>>>>>    3. I do not yet know specifically how I am going to use this 
>>>>>    resource in a teaching setting.
>>>>>    4. I am new to TW…
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8fe43ef7-5f07-4278-b3ef-8fa2002cb244n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to