Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 October 2007 18.05:04 Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> NTP prefers higher-stratum good clocks, but it prefers good clocks with
>> low jitter more.
> 
> Do you have numbers on this?  I've never seen ntpd prefer higher stratum 
> clocks more than a few minutes after startup (until the error correction 
> algo had enough data).  But then, I've only had big differences in delay 
> and not much in jitter.

I have an example, yes:

3-sec# ntpq -np ntp0.codefab.com
      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
  127.127.1.1     .LOCL.          10 l   45   64  377    0.000    0.000   0.000
+18.145.0.30     .PSC.            1 u   78  512  377    9.285    0.172   0.284
-17.254.0.26     17.106.100.13    2 u   80  512  377   85.593    0.606   0.240
*209.51.161.238  .CDMA.           1 u  152  512  377    5.618    0.527   3.967
+198.82.1.201    198.82.247.40    2 u  107  512  377   16.585    0.388   0.146
  199.103.21.227  199.103.21.233   3 u  340  512  376    0.187    0.106   0.172
-199.103.21.228  65.212.71.103    2 u  191  512  376    0.000   -0.998   0.938
-199.103.21.226  208.184.49.9     2 u  341  512  376    0.021   14.651   0.279
4-sec# ntpq -np ntp1.codefab.com
      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
==============================================================================
  127.127.1.1     LOCAL(1)        10 l    1   64  377    0.000    0.000   0.002
+66.250.45.2     18.26.4.105      2 u  712 2048  377    4.379   -0.513   2.070
-18.26.4.105     .CDMA.           1 u  583 2048  377   20.009   -4.832   5.520
+128.59.59.177   128.59.39.48     2 u  679 2048  377    5.333    0.852   0.087
-128.118.25.5    .WWV.            1 u  685 2048  377   32.870  -20.846   1.222
*199.103.21.233  209.51.161.238   2 u  234  512  373    0.275    0.048   0.171
+199.103.21.228  65.212.71.103    2 u  237  512  376    0.002   -1.198   0.455
-199.103.21.226  208.184.49.9     2 u  137  512  376    0.124   14.729   0.194

Notice that the second machine has chosen to select ntp0.codefab.com aka IP 
199.103.21.233 because that machine has a very low jitter (it's a Sun E450 
running SunOS 5.8).

-- 
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers

Reply via email to