-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Nelson Minar wrote:
> [ ... ]
>> FWIW, your initial post is what prompted me to get my pool server up
>> into stratum 2. Before it'd been in stratum 3. I think for almost any
>> practical application the difference is not significant, but on the
>> other hand if I'm serving time to a few hundred thousand people I might
>> as well do a good job of it.
>
> NTP prefers higher-stratum good clocks, but it prefers good clocks with low
> jitter more.
>
>> Still, I love data and would be happy to see that stratum data online.
>> Even better would be measures of everyone's jitter, root dispersion,
>> etc. I'm curious how good the pool server's clocks really are. But
>> that's all work for Ask, and the new DNS is so awesome I'm loathe to
>> request another pony.
>
> Is this what you're looking for:
>
> host pool.ntp.org | awk '{print $4}' | xargs ntpq -p
>
> ...? (Replace "ntpq -p" with "ntpq -c as -c peers ..." :-)
>
fwiw, I'd put an 'n' in there too. "ntpq -np", "ntpq -nc peers", etc as
hostname lookups take forever at times and I usually just find it easier
to read if it's just ip addresses.
- --
Todd
http://www.vrillusions.com/
My PGP Key ID: 0xBC90230C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHA9FciSebwryQIwwRAomxAKC+xdPxhMX9clsIGgNrFzdnTwxFtQCdEV7P
RGPi3wfI+DNkzhzfLFgFno4=
=jbyg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
