Nelson Minar wrote:
[ ... ]
> FWIW, your initial post is what prompted me to get my pool server up
> into stratum 2. Before it'd been in stratum 3. I think for almost any
> practical application the difference is not significant, but on the
> other hand if I'm serving time to a few hundred thousand people I might
> as well do a good job of it.
NTP prefers higher-stratum good clocks, but it prefers good clocks with low
jitter more.
> Still, I love data and would be happy to see that stratum data online.
> Even better would be measures of everyone's jitter, root dispersion,
> etc. I'm curious how good the pool server's clocks really are. But
> that's all work for Ask, and the new DNS is so awesome I'm loathe to
> request another pony.
Is this what you're looking for:
host pool.ntp.org | awk '{print $4}' | xargs ntpq -p
...? (Replace "ntpq -p" with "ntpq -c as -c peers ..." :-)
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
timekeepers mailing list
[email protected]
https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
