On 30/10/2007, James C. McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > As expected, the critical two requirements appear to be E0 (open > > source) and E2 (selective differentiated access). > ... > > You already know that Bugzilla passes E2, and timeless and Max are > > making it clear that C17 is met easily by the Bugzilla community. > > That's why we're running it in a sandbox mode, and discussing how > > its various configuration options might be modified to fit the > > existing process more closely. > > > > So, are there other candidates people wish to have considered? > > > No. I vote to go with Bugzilla (v3?) - as long as we > can get rid of the "zarro boogs found" message.
+1, That would be my vote as well, though I'm not bothered at all by the programmer humour message. Mercurial also has hooks for bugzilla, and BugZilla has a great xml-rpc interface. Of all the ones I know of, it's just about the only candidate that meets the criteria (off-hand evaluation). -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
