James Carlson wrote: > James C. McPherson writes: >> Stephen Hahn wrote: >>> As expected, the critical two requirements appear to be E0 (open >>> source) and E2 (selective differentiated access). >> ... >>> You already know that Bugzilla passes E2, and timeless and Max are >>> making it clear that C17 is met easily by the Bugzilla community. >>> That's why we're running it in a sandbox mode, and discussing how >>> its various configuration options might be modified to fit the >>> existing process more closely. >>> >>> So, are there other candidates people wish to have considered? >> >> No. I vote to go with Bugzilla (v3?) - as long as we >> can get rid of the "zarro boogs found" message. > > That'd be my vote as well. It's familiar, flexible, well-supported, > and sufficient. > > The overly cute and (in my opinion) unprofessional-looking error > message, though, should be fixed. I expect end users to one day end > up using this interface to track their own problems, and having them > see something that looks like an attempt at a joke makes them think > the product itself is a joke. It reflects badly.
Yup. I said as much to timeless via irc earlier this evening. Stephen - do we have enough momentum to finalise the DTS evaluation? If there's voting required, could you remind us who has standing please? thankyou, James C. McPherson -- Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris Sun Microsystems _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
