James C. McPherson writes: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > As expected, the critical two requirements appear to be E0 (open > > source) and E2 (selective differentiated access). > ... > > You already know that Bugzilla passes E2, and timeless and Max are > > making it clear that C17 is met easily by the Bugzilla community. > > That's why we're running it in a sandbox mode, and discussing how > > its various configuration options might be modified to fit the > > existing process more closely. > > > > So, are there other candidates people wish to have considered? > > > No. I vote to go with Bugzilla (v3?) - as long as we > can get rid of the "zarro boogs found" message.
That'd be my vote as well. It's familiar, flexible, well-supported, and sufficient. The overly cute and (in my opinion) unprofessional-looking error message, though, should be fixed. I expect end users to one day end up using this interface to track their own problems, and having them see something that looks like an attempt at a joke makes them think the product itself is a joke. It reflects badly. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
