On Di, 2008-07-22 at 14:11 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Samuel Murray (Groenkloof) wrote: > > The real need is the need to see who translated what, who > > translated when, and who translated. As far as I know, "who > > translated what" is currently not logged, > > And this "who translated what" is most important. The "when" is > mainly important in order to know whether a change is old and a > mistake can be ascribed to inexperience, or the change is recent > and a mistake should be pointed out to the maker. But most > important stays: which actual changes were made, preferrably > viewable in wikipedia-style diffs. > > Benno
I agree that this will be useful. XLIFF files can more easily store unit-level attribution and phase information. For PO, we need to make an alternative plan. I haven't been following all commits in the Mozootle branch closely. Dan/Wil, is this type of information something that you have addressed? The incomplete "tracks" in the current code was a start to keeping track of these types of things. Friedel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
