to be perfectly honest, i don't know why i'm still on this list, because i 
dumped my sprint 
treo 650 for an iPhone on june 30, 2007. i was slightly unhappy at the loss of 
3rd party 
apps at first, but the overall package was so superior to the treo that it 
wasnt long before 
i was happy again. and once the dev team figured out the jailbreak and people 
started 
developing apps, i was *very* happy. and now with the app store, there are 
loads of 
interesting applications available. i can do things more efficently with the 
iPhone than i 
ever could do with the treo.

anyway, where can you get a new iphone for $85.95? i'd like to know.

http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/service/battery/

as i said i've had the iPhone for a year and the battery is still going strong. 
it holds the 
same charge it did on the first day i owned it. apple is most certainly not 
engaging in 
"malicious and predatory engineering." do you seriously think iPods and iPhones 
would be 
as popular as they are if the batteries were a serious problem for people?

i've owned 3 iPods and 2 iPhones and none of them have ever needed a battery 
replaced.

use what works for you. the only ridiculous thing here is mindless and 
uninformed hating 
on the iPhone.




--- In [email protected], Scandals & Animals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, but the iPhone's battery seems engineered to last a year or less, 
> requiring the user 
to send it in for an expensive replacement, or preferably just purchase another 
iPhone.  
That's apparently by design.  The replacement fee is almost as much as a new 
iPhone, and 
then you're without a phone until they ship it back.  There's a video on 
youtube or similar 
site made by a guy who called Apple and recorded it.  He asked how to change 
the battery 
and was told he'd have to send it in, how much it would cost, etc.
> 
> That's not just ridiculous; it's malicious and predatory engineering and 
> marketing.
> 
>  ..... Original Message .......
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:24:32 -0400 "Harold M. Goldner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >I agree that the non-removable battery isn't that big of a deal.  I tend 
> >towards the 
obsessive-compulsive, so I got a spare battery almost as soon as I got my first 
Treo, but I 
had used Palms with nonremovable batteries for 9 years before that, and Zauri 
for 5 or 
more before that.
> >
> >And I've even cracked an ipod or two to refresh the battery or drive.
> >
> >Harold
> >
> >
> > ..... Original Message .......
> >On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:15:00 -0400 Levi Wallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >___
> >Harold M. Goldner
> >www.goldnerlaw.com
> >Sent from my Palm Trëo 755p
> >
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>



Reply via email to