Lance wrote: > "Using" scripture/pretext for promoting non-orthodox > views i.e. perfectionist understanding of regenerate > HK.
Aw, Lance, you disappoint me. Now you are resorting to ad hominem arguments. I'm not doing any proof-texting and my views are not "non-orthodox." They are non-Calvinist to be sure, but not "non-orthodox." You are a well read man. Read the works of Jacobus Arminius for the arguments showing that perfectionism per se is not unorthodox in that it was never repudiated by any of the church fathers. I also hope you understand that there are various views of perfectionism, some of them very unorthodox, but that is not to say that all perspectives of perfectionism are faulty. There are faulty views of the Incarnation and the Atonement too, but we don't throw out all theology of the Incarnation and the Atonement just because we have found a few to be wrong. If you find something faulty in what I say, present the Scriptures and your arguments which would expose my error. Don't just hurl names at me. Present your case. Peace be with you. David Miller, Beverly Hills, Florida. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
