|
John, my first experience with Greek came under the
tutelage of Mounce's Grammar. I know him personally, as he was promoting this
work at the University I attended. He swung through on a regular basis to see
how we were doing and if he had made himself clear in terms of presentation.
This very question was asked of him, the one concerning continuous activity,
nothing to do with I John in particular. The question had more to do with an
English understanding of gerunds (verbal nouns) than a Greek understanding
of participles. His answer was lucid: There is no gerund in Greek. Greek words
appear in Greek. They only become problematic in translation. At the point of
translation English is always an approximation of a Greek thought. Hence the
target is too approximate as closely as we can Greek words and ideas. Hence
it is not inappropriate to translate a present tense with a gerund-based English
approximation. Nor is it always necessary or even possible to do this. The point
is to get the present tense across the divide, if a gerund will do
this then by all means use it. The point is to get it across the language
barrier into English while conveying the Greek idea as closely as
possible. Our problem of course is this: Ideas are always interpretive. This is
the same thing I am speaking to in my pistis post. There is always
an interpretive task involved any time we try to convey meaning. That task
increases exponentially when trying to convey it across a language
barrier.
I think the continuous case is appropriate here.
While the English texts do not state it as such, that present tense idea
must still be taken into view. That's my two onions worth.
Bill
Ok -- I am in the twilight zone here, missing something. I took these words from Terrys quote of David Miller (I think). I did not get this email apparently. And this is why I am saying maybe our disagreement is semantical. Or maybe I am just plain dumb but is not this quote saying exactly what I was saying" Terry quotes: "The Spirit is willing, but this old flesh is weak. There you go and Terry may have said it better than I. I do not believe in "total depravity." When it come to being perfect, sinless, it is not that can't do. Rather, it is because we won"t. Romans 7 makes this abundantly clear. The battle rages -- one will against the other. Anyway, Terry put it exactly. john |
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Terry Clifton
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Wm. Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? ShieldsFamily
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Knpraise
- RE: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Wm. Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Wm. Taylor
- Re: [TruthTalk] Re:APRIL FOOLS DAY??? Wm. Taylor
- [TruthTalk] Gnosticism David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Gnosticism Lance Muir
- RE: [TruthTalk] Gnosticism David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Gnosticism Lance Muir
- Re: [TruthTalk] Gnosticism Terry Clifton
- RE: [TruthTalk] Gnosticism David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Gnosticism Wm. Taylor
- RE: [TruthTalk] Gnosticism David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Gnosticism Wm. Taylor

