RE: [TruthTalk] Divine Nature

[ShieldsFamily]

I hate to butt in, but I think the “Angel of the Lord” was Jesus, don’t you? Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 3:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Divine Nature   Oh? and what happens when one does not attempt to apprehend the Trinity . . .   I don't know. Will you tell me? I never said I never tried and I think anyone who says that "understand" the nature of God is a liar. How can the finite wrap their minds around the infinite?   . . . Never mind. J I think I know.    I was specifically referring to individuals like the "Angel of YHVH." I am speaking of those whom the Biblical Text given Divine status in one way or another.   -- slade -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Wm. Taylor Sent: Thursday, 01 July, 2004 23:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Divine Nature "The more one attempts to answer and codify the position, the higher the risk for heresy and wrong-positioning."   Oh? and what happens when one does not attempt to apprehend the Trinity . . .   "There are other 'Characters' within the Tanakh who claim the status of YHVH that we cannot ignore simply because it doesn't fit the Trinitarian mode."           Bill