Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
on 2002/12/10 3:16 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I'm not suggesting that you use Logkit, but the Avalon logging interface and facades.I'm strongly -1 on using the Avalon logging interface because this is something that belongs in Commons. There is no reason for Avalon to have *yet another logging interface* when commons-logging is available.
Actually, the Avalon interface IIRC is older.
It has not been reimplemented, rather the opposite, and your attitude is of no help.Everyone who doesn't want to standardize on a single logging implementation should at least standardize on a single logging interface and that should be commons-logging. If you have a problem with commons-logging, then it should be addressed there, not re-implemented somewhere else.
Anyway, I will propose again to our list that we use the Logger interface somehow in the new Avalon 5, or try somehow to reunite the scism.
Remember though that the fact that commons strongly opposes anything that has even a remote hint about avalon framework really doesn't help.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
