Daniel Rall wrote:
That's why our implementation, logkit, is not part of the framework. The framework actually just has hooks to use other implementations.Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Jon Scott Stevens wrote:on 2002/12/10 11:51 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Avalon is a server framework. You mean that logging is not to be a concern of a server framework?Correct. Very much so. If Avalon was a logging framework, then logging wouldbe a concern. But it isn't.Logging done in server apps is a *concern* of the server framework; the logging policies are definately concerns of server apps, hence of the frameworks to create them.Logging is definitely a concern of server frameworks. However, it's not up to a framework to supply implementations for something which will have very different use cases depending upon a user's environment.
So just choose your implementation, hook it up, and you're set. This is in line with Leo's proposal of using Commons Logging underneath.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
