> > Anyway, I will propose again to our list that we use the Logger > > interface somehow in the new Avalon 5, or try somehow to reunite the scism. > > +1 > > Avalon should drop whatever duplicate logging interfaces it has and adopt > commons-logging. The same should go for Turbine and every other Jakarta > application out there.
Agreed! If I could implement LogEnabled, and have the logging facade provided by the container be a commons-logging class, that would meet everyone's needs I think. We could share the interfaces through commons, but choose not to use the LogFactory class (and its associated discovery stuff) as we wish. -- jt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
