on 2002/12/10 5:22 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's of no help in trying to find a common solution
That is why they called the project "Jakarta Commons".
> There are technical points that Avalon logging pursues that are missing
> from Commons Logging.
The point being that you should work in the Commons project to get them
added instead of coming up with another logging interface and using that.
Sure, you have the right to fork, but it shouldn't be the first thing that
happens.
> And it's sensible that projects that use the
> Avalon framework use the Logging that is part of the framework, I don't
> see the "pushing" part you refer to.
It is not sensible to me. It is a terrible idea in fact. If you say you care
about good design, then you won't base all of your decisions around using
Avalon for things that really don't belong in Avalon.
-jon
--
StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
http://studioz.tv/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
