On 12/01/07, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Personally I like the PIC lists tag in subject line method because it > > allows one to better scan an inbox visually and sort by subject. > > So a subject header would look like > > Re: [TurboGears][MAINT] Tagging list posts (Was: I surrender (second > > edition)) > > I'm sorry but anything that is human-dependent on this area is doomed to > fail. I'm one person that HATES classifying the type of messages I send. > Really. I use filters, I can couple with automatic classifiers -- I hate when > they mangle subject lines or the message per se -- etc. but I'm not one person > that will add anything either to the body or the subject line. I won't remove > anything -- from either parts... --, though.
[snip] > I'm sorry for the sincere opinion, but I believe this is the wrong way to > solve the problem. The correct way would be using a better MUA, IMHO. If > your's doesn't provide you with enough resources, choose one that does. I agree quite a bit with that last sentiment (it's why I use tabs instead of spaces to indent my source code). I've never had any problems when using gmail for lists. However solving the problem the wrong way does seem quite fun. Ed --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
