I am noticing the clunky editing on Colbert as well. A typical one is they cut 
to Jon Batiste who will say something unrelated to what Colbert is talking about
⁣Not sent from an iPhone​

On Jan 22, 2018, 6:20 AM, at 6:20 AM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
>Dave always felt strongly that his show should be as “live to tape” as
>possible, though of course that did not count obviously and less
>obviously
>pre-taped segments. One change when Colbert took over is that he
>clearly
>does not have that same feeling. I think this is consistent with how he
>did
>things on the CR, where I am pretty sure they routinely re-did what
>would
>have been “live to tape” segements, often multiple times, and edited
>together the best bits for the broadcast. Colbert has also, as we have
>discussed here, been more comfortable using musical, interview and
>comedy
>pieces recorded previously and blended in, and I suspect it is not
>uncommon
>that he stops tape and re-shoots specific segments. I don’t know if it
>is
>“sloppy” editing as much as a growing awareness that this kind of
>editing
>happens routinely that leads to the sometimes jarring discontinuities -
>with the host or bandleader wearing a different tie or suit.
>
>All of that said, while I am not sure it qualifies as actual lying, I
>would
>rather they cut out the “live to tape” thing, unless they find a way to
>telegraph it more specifically as an homage to Sanders. I don’t like it
>because it strongly implies that this version of the show is shot with
>more
>direct continuity than Dave’s version, and that is clearly not so.
>
>On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 7:31 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 10:02 AM Adam Bowie <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>
>>> Because we get few talk shows over here, and for the most part I
>only see
>>> segments on YouTube, for me, "Live on tape [from Hollywood]" will
>always
>>> mean The Larry Sanders Show.
>>>
>>
>> Adam, that’s always what I think of when I hear it. Besides, if we
>are
>> being pedantic about the word “live,” we should also point out the
>shows
>> are not on “tape” as tape hasn’t been industry standard in years.
>>
>> As for the non-live/edited aspect of the talk shows, it is the
>frankly
>> sloppy editing that has brought the issue to the forefront. I worked
>a lot
>> of talk shows back in the day, and I’ve attended several since then,
>and
>> the only show that strived to air an as-recorded broadcast was Leno’s
>> Tonight Show. But editors and producers used to strive for
>continuity, and
>> that just isn’t the case anymore. I think it would matter less if the
>> editing resulted in a greater amount of comedy/substance, but I don’t
>think
>> that has been the case.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Adam
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Brad Beam <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tune in tomorrow night after your late local news for a new "Jimmy
>>>> Kimmel Live on Tape."
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 20, 2018, at 10:44, Jon Delfin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The deception begins with the daily "Live on tape" announcement.
>Nothing
>>>> will change.
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 20, 2018 8:04 AM, "PGage" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have pretty much stopped watching on Fridays. I am not exactly
>angry,
>>>>> but I have been calling on them to be more transparent about this
>(I have
>>>>> emailed them a couple of times, no reply).
>>>>>
>>>>> I don’t think it’s laziness; it takes a lot of time and energy to
>do
>>>>> those shows. Colbert wants time with the Fam in NJ, and he wants
>his staff
>>>>> to do that too.
>>>>>
>>>>> The show is so ultra topical that even a rerun from a month ago
>would
>>>>> feel dated. So I don’t mind what they are doing, just wish they
>were more
>>>>> honest about it
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 1:28 AM 'Dave Sikula' via TVorNotTV <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Have to agree. When Dave was dark on Fridays, the alleged excuse
>was
>>>>>> that they used the time to tape material outside of the studio.
>(That it
>>>>>> was more that Dave just couldn't be bothered to work five days is
>beside
>>>>>> the point ... ) Colbert doing this just strikes me a lazy. Of
>course, Myers
>>>>>> does it, too, but at least Late Night admits the whole show is a
>rerun.
>>>>>> I'll be interested to see if they do five new shows a week during
>sweeps or
>>>>>> keep this up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --Dave Sikula
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 9:52:41 PM UTC-8, David Bruggeman
>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the second week in a row that The Late Show has repeated
>an
>>>>>>> interview on a Friday show.  Last week it was a second go for
>Fire and Fury
>>>>>>> author Michael Wolff, who had appeared earlier that week. 
>Tonight it's
>>>>>>> comedian and Crashing star Pete Holmes, a repeat from January
>10.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The annoyance for me comes from the show making no indication
>that
>>>>>>> the interview had aired before.  And yes, the show has reaired
>interview
>>>>>>> footage before, but it has typically called it out and in some
>cases
>>>>>>> included material that wasn't aired the first time around. 
>These last two
>>>>>>> instances had no new material, AFAIK.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>Google
>>>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send
>>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups
>>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>-- 
>Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to [email protected].
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to