Sorry, I understand people just doing consultant that help user to configure and use and install the product or just answer email questions
I do that also:-)
What I should say is that when company include someone's code then sale the product to make product money
this is very different (IMHO0 then just  consulting services)
sorry again

On 9/9/2011 1:53 PM, William Deegan wrote:
LaoTsao,

If you are using any open source software which has a company behind it making 
(some) money off it (most do, large, medium, or small), should you then also 
pay for the features you use which they develop?

It's not really in the spirit of open source to worry about who's making money.
I guarantee every open source project has some people making money using it, 
supporting it,etc.

Even the FSF says that it's o.k. for people to make money supporting software, 
and getting paid to make enhancements to it. They just think all source code 
should be open. (As I understand it).

In my consulting business I regularly use gcc, make, scons, gridengine, 
bugzilla, python, perl, TCL, and a long list of open source projects.

Should I share some of my income with them?

I usually just spend time supporting and donating fixes back to them when I 
find them.
(And writing tests for them, most people's least favorite things to do.).

-Bill Deegan
Founder
Bad Dog Consulting

On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:26 AM, LaoTsao wrote:

what i mean is that if someone else make $ of your code then you should get a 
share of $

Sent from my iPad
Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D

On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:25, LaoTsao<[email protected]>  wrote:

sorry it is me that mixup the copyright and copyright reassignment


Sent from my iPad
Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D

On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:21, Ron Chen<[email protected]>  wrote:

--- On Sat, 9/10/11, William Bryce<[email protected]>  wrote:
Hi Ron,

I suggest you take your 'tin foil hat off' Ron.
Hmm, so you were claiming me starting a flame war. Guess who is doing it now?

In other successful open source projects, there is transparency. With Univa not 
disclosing what is open and what is close, I don't think we can should continue this 
"working together" discussion or even bring it up again in the near future.

-Ron


Initially we thought that we should ask
people to assign copyright to Univa if they want to include
fixes  but we continued to discuss and we were
discussing that if we do have copyright assignment that it
be assigned to an 'independent 3rd party' i.e. not Univa but
something that we all have a stake in.

But you can believe what you want to believe Ron.

Bill.

On 2011-09-09, at 11:44 AM, Ron Chen wrote:

Bill, please stop misleading the list. This is EXACTLY
this kind of tactics that I am against.
I am not talking about not putting copyright to my
code (my code is under SISSL, and Univa Grid Engine has 10
features that were developed by me.)
What I was referring to is copyright reassignment. You
have requested me to reassign the copyright of my code to
Univa not long ago, I am suprised that you could mix up the
two.
-Ron



--- On Fri, 9/9/11, William Bryce<[email protected]>
wrote:
I agree with Hung-Sheng,

You should put copyright on your code, and in
regards to
Ron's comments.  I won't comment - Ron can
have a flame
war with himself :-)

Bill.

On 2011-09-09, at 11:22 AM, LaoTsao wrote:

IMHO, every code need copy right
especial someone else try to make $ out of
your code
my 2c

Sent from my iPad
Hung-Sheng Tsao ( LaoTsao) Ph.D

On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:40, Ron Chen<[email protected]>
wrote:
--- On Fri, 9/9/11, Mark Dixon<[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm still a bit fuzzy on what
differentiates
the efforts,
and am concerned that the projects
might not
be pulling in a
common direction to benefit the
community as a
whole.
Mark,

In fact our existance benefits the
community --
did you know that we fixed the memory accounting
bug on
Linux in the Open Grid Scheduler back in Aug last
year, and
Son of Grid Engine copied our fix? And Univa Grid
Engine
8.0.0 still has that bug *as of today*, and its
customers
need to wait for 8.0.1 to get a fix.
And I hightly doubt Univa would put as
much effort
as it is now and add the hwloc support into the
open core if
we did not announce our hwloc support back in
April:
http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/projects/hwloc/GridEnginehwloc.html

Also, I strongly believe that Univa will
now put
more effort in to get GPU integration, IPv6
support, SGI MPT
integration, etc into the open core ASAP as we are
working
on those features in Open Grid Scheduler.
When there is no competition, most
businesses tend
not to work hard to gain market share - and I
don't think
Univa is different.

Isn't this what the steering committee
was
aiming to improve?
As far as I can see, there's been no
news
posted to
gridengine.org since February.
The page is old, and Stephen Dennis quited
Univa
as well.

I'm not trying to have a go at anyone,
I think
everyone
wants what is best for the community:
I'm just
hoping for a
bit more constructive discussion about
what
that might be
:)

I have a tendency not to trust companies,
as a lot
of them are somewhat dishonest and lack of
integrity in
order to gain a customer or two. I have not
totally written
off Univa yet, but what Univa posted on the
website about
open source Grid Engine is not true (and the ones
most piss
me off are "UGE Wins Hands Down"&  "Free Grid
Engine
isn't Free"?) -- so at this point working with
Univa is out
of the question.
And even outout the stupid market tactics,
Univa
is never clear what would be put in the open core
and what
is closed source. I am not signing the copy right
assignment
- they can continue to copy my code and feature as
they
wanted.
-Ron



Mark
--

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Dixon
   Email    :
[email protected]
HPC/Grid Systems Support
   Tel (int): 35429
Information Systems Services
   Tel
(ext): +44(0)113 343 5429
University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users



_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
William Bryce | VP of Products
Univa Corporation - 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite
100 Lisle,
Il, 65032 USA
Email [email protected]
| Mobile: 512.751.8014 | Office: 905.237.4462


William Bryce | VP of Products
Univa Corporation - 1001 Warrenville Road, Suite 100 Lisle,
Il, 65032 USA
Email [email protected]
| Mobile: 512.751.8014 | Office: 905.237.4462


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

<<attachment: laotsao.vcf>>

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to