> bg wrote:
> > <snip>
> > Hadn't thought of that. Figured since there was an "Italic"
> > icon on the toolbar between the "Bold" and the Underline"
> > that that was where it was done.
> >
> > I tried selecting, then "Format", "Character" - no italic
> > produced that way, either, even though under "Format", "Character"
> > I specifically selected (from the list) and applied "Italic".
> >
> > It doesn't work whether I invoke it, then type, either.
> >
> > This is really bizarre. And I'm not using some off-the-wall
> > obscure font, either - it's the good old default Bitstream Vera
> > Serif 12.

Barbara Duprey wrote:

> The icon usually works (never seen any reports of this kind of behavior 
> before), as does the Format > Character. Do the bolding and underlining 
> icons work? What happens if you change to a different font temporarily, 
> like Times New Roman?

bg:

Changed to Frys Baskerville BT - same result. For some unaccountable
reason my lengthy list of fonts from the original Core2 does not
include Times New Roman. I should clarify - same lack of response
from both the icon *and* from "Format", "Character".

BTW now that I look at Baskerville again I may make it my default font
as I had back in the WP/DOS days. It really is a very readable typeface.

The "bold" and "underline" icons work as you would expect - as on-off
toggles either to modify existing highlighted text or pre-typing on,
post-typing off. 

This is decidedly strange. But maybe a blessing in disguise if it forces
me to accelerate my upgrade plans :-)

Brewster
-- 
**********************************************************************
W. Brewster Gillett             [email protected]            Portland, OR  USA
**********************************************************************
Simply because you don't like to hear it, that doesn't make it untrue.
**********************************************************************


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to