On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:30 PM, David Lowe wrote: >any of those dictionaries that weren't explicitly licensed will officially >cease to exist,
Going by memory, the licenses included: * public domain; * GNU GPL 2.0; * GNU LGPL; * Free Documentation license; * CC-BY; >as far as OOo is concerned. Wondering when the official announcement that there are three forks of OOoo code will be announced. And how soon after that the extensions for those forks will be incompatible with each other. >any user that depends upon one of those unlicensed dictionaries will have to >convert it themselves To refer to them as "unlicensed", is, at best, a misnomer. Unless comprehensive, clear, and detailed instructions are provided on how to convert a dictionary to an extension, OOo will be treated as having _no_ spell checking support. You do realize that most of the l10n groups aren't aware that dictionaries have to be repackaged as extensions. > or find another word processor. I'm sure the First Nation Consortium will love that. Or the person who posted Message-ID <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Especially considering that that message is how to improve the dictionaries that can be utilized by OOo. xan jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
