This is great !
I am looking forward to reading the new documentation.

Best regards

2013/1/23 Rob Schroeder <>

> Hi all,
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:25:41 +0100, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Philippe Demaison
> > <> wrote:
> > > Are you kidding ?
> >
> > First thing first, while everyone agrees that a good documentation is
> > a good thing, you should consider that you don't pay anyone to write
> > it.
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:08:35 +0100, Thies Edeling wrote:
> > Wicket is open source, if you feel that the documentation is lacking -
> feel
> > free to contribute.
> don't mean to offend anyone, but things like those are the least helpful
> kind of answers possible. We all know Wicket is open source, we all know
> what open source means, an we all know that we aren't paying anyone.
> It's just that if someone had the resources to pay anyone or
> significantly contribute to the documentation himself (*after* having
> learned everything he'd need, and after doing so *without* a complete
> reference), he'd probably not complain in the first place. More probable
> is that he's already got a job to do himself and is just looking for the
> best tool to do so.
> Of course, shouting abuse (not that I'd think anyone here did) at maybe
> even unsalaried developers who are doing what they can doesn't help,
> either.
> To add my experience to the subject, I bought the 'Wicket in Action'
> book some time ago, and for my first steps with Wicket 6 I tried to
> extract what I could from it and the Net.
> The problem is, just as Philippe said, much has changed between
> versions, and it's not only that things I find sometimes don't apply
> anymore, but, what's possibly worse, I can't even know whether code
> examples I find still work until I tried them myself, as the changes
> aren't really exhaustively documented and because, well, there is no
> such thing as a Wicket 6 reference.
> As far as I am concerned, I'll keep trying to get into Wicket 6, though
> - but that's something I'll be doing in my spare time, because I
> probably won't ever see Wicket used at my main job, and so I can take my
> time.
> Cheers,
> Robert
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Reply via email to