I guess that's possible if the camera was in some sort of extended
play (read: lower quality) mode, since tapes are 60 minutes long to
begin with, and 40 minutes if you're recording DVcam instead of miniDV.


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "mcmpress" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have read that the concept of the movie's TRT is that the entire
> movie lasts 80 minutes, no longer than a tape would in the camera.
> 
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Cammack" <billcammack@>
> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't see the movie, but based on the synopsis in the wiki, it
> > would have had to have been tape.  That's the only way that they would
> > have had scenes from a previous recording.
> > 
> > Had it been disk-based or card-based, that would not have happened
> > because there's no "recording over" disk files.  There's deleting disk
> > files so you have more space to record.
> > 
> > Also, files are recorded in sequential order, so if it were disk or
> > card-based, all of the old footage would have been first, and all of
> > the new footage would have been after it.
> > 
> > 
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Amirault"
> > <ramirault@> wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Michael Verdi"
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > They refer to tape in the film, I think, because they use the
device
> > > > of having taped over previously recorded video. That wouldn't
happen
> > > > with a disc based camera. That being said, some of it was shot
with
> > > > the panasonic hvx200 but most was shot with the Sony CineAlta F23
> > > > which is not a consumer camera.
> > > 
> > > I didn't get the impression that we were supposed to believe it was
> > a disc 
> > > based camera (either DVD or hard disk) .  What came to my minds
> eye was 
> > > something like an XACTI .. a very small, memory card based unit ..
> > *very* 
> > > rugged compared to either real tape or DVD or hard disk.  I think
> > using the 
> > > term "tape" was more as a convenience. It's the most common term and
> > does 
> > > not need any further explanation.
> > > 
> > > If not a card based camcorder .. than a mini-DV unit would be my
next 
> > > choice.
> > > 
> > > Richard Amirault
> > > Boston, MA, USA
> > > http://n1jdu.org
> > > http://bostonfandom.org
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to