My understanding is that MS Windows Phone 8 has an App Store which also must be 
used. Unfortunately, as there is currently no accessibility in Windows Phone 8, 
this fact escapes our notice.

David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
Sent from my iPhone

On 05/08/2013, at 18:23, Christopher Chaltain <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think the difference here is that MS doesn't do anything to prohibit an 
> application developer from providing a trial or force you to only purchase 
> applications through their store. Apple, through it's App Store policies, 
> hasn't allowed trials in the App Store, unless a developer is going to use an 
> in app purchase. I think this is why, plus the fact that Apple gets a piece 
> of each App Store sale, means Apple is part of the problem and needs to be 
> part of the solution.
> 
> BTW, with few exceptions, I think this discussion has been pretty civil and 
> unemotional. Unfortunately, I crossed the line myself, but I apologized for 
> that, and I hope my behavior has improved.
> 
>        On 08/05/2013 01:10 AM, Joanne Chua wrote:
>> It seems like now the debate/arguement is out of hand.
>> We are first talking about how unsuccessful some individual get the
>> refund from their so call inaccessible apps to how program got distributed.
>> Regardless of what it is, everyone got their own opinion, and views on
>> such topic.
>> There is no right and wrong, but often, we use our emotional views
>> rather than our rational views.
>> 
>> Yes, indeed, there're hundrets and thousands of software developers
>> offer trial software, and you can then choose to purchase or not
>> purchase the software. But, as far as i know (which is not 5 years ago)
>> those trial softwares have nothing to do with Micro Soft, or any of the
>> OS developer. It got to do with the developer itself.
>> 
>> So, why don't blind pc users complain to Microsoft for some third party
>> software that don't work with windows and demanding microsoft for
>> refund, but Apple user seems to do so?
>> 
>> Is that because, Apple listen to users voice and some people, think, it
>> is a good way to use it as a complain maganism?
>> 
>> I'm not saying this is wrong. Just like, i know someone who use Jaws on
>> Window with BootCam. Wrote to FreedomScientific for some bug they found
>> on Jaws, and FreedomScientific respond is that, they have nothing to do
>> with it cause it operates on Mac, and Jaws doesn't operate on Mac...
>> 
>> Yes, you can not to pay, even sue the restorant for undercook food, but
>> you can't sue the restorant for not using the knifes and fork you use
>> to, the brand of tomato sauce you like, or the napkin foulded in circle
>> rather than a triangular shape that you wanted.
>> 
>> The flip side of Inclusion is Exclusion.Joanne Chua
>> Leaders For Tomorrow 2013 Candidate
>> Send from my iPad
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> *From:* "Aman Singer" <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> *Date:* 5 August 2013 15:11:15 ACST
>>> *To:* <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>> *Subject:* *RE: Bad experience with iTunes Store support regarding app
>>> refund*
>>> *Reply-To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> Hello, David.
>>> That's just the point. It is not impossible, but it is at least
>>> difficult, to find a program on the PC which does not have either a
>>> trial or a method through which a user may examine it before purchase.
>>> You seem, if I may say so, to be thinking about things as they were 5
>>> years ago rather than as they are now. I have, in the past 5 years at
>>> least, never purchased a program I didn't know I could use. The one
>>> case where I wrote to a developer before a purchase to ask about
>>> accessibility was where the program had to do with tax filing, and the
>>> application was, obviously, not suitable for timed trial or return
>>> because it had only one use in a limited time. I happen to agree with
>>> you that getting Apple to implement a trial system like everyone else
>>> (Google, Amazon, etc) is highly unlikely, but this is a problem unique
>>> to Apple. Everyone else is offering trials, both on the PC and on
>>> mobile platforms.
>>> Aman
>>> 
>>> al Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Chittenden
>>> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 12:47 AM
>>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: Bad experience with iTunes Store support regarding app refund
>>> 
>>> You manage it the same way you manage it with a PC. You contact the
>>> developer. If the developer has specifically addressed accessibility,
>>> they will tell you. If not, they will say no, or they will not know
>>> what you are talking about. You then take the chance, or you don't
>>> take the chance.
>>> 
>>> The only difference is, with the PC, you have about a 10% chance that
>>> the software will be accessible. If it isn't, you wasted your money,
>>> because the software cannot be returned once you open it. I used to
>>> give it away as gifts to people I knew would like it.
>>> 
>>> With iOS, unless it's a game, or a very graphically intensive app, you
>>> have a 66% chance it will be somewhat accessible. These odds are the
>>> best I have had in the computer marketplace, so I do occasionally take
>>> chances. And yes, I have lost a couple hundred dollars over the past
>>> three years because I have purchased apps that ended up not being
>>> accessible.
>>> 
>>> If you don't want to take any chances, use our crowd-sourcing option,
>>> applevis. Remember that we have a very small user base, so our
>>> crowd-sourcing is quite limited.
>>> 
>>> David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>> Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 05/08/2013, at 11:44, Maria and Joe Chapman
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   HI.  if this option is not viable how do we get around this
>>> problem? It's quite unreasonable to think that someone is going to buy
>>> an app over say $10 and just say "well there's 10 dollars gone down
>>> the drain" and never be able to use the app? This list and applevis is
>>> wonderful and the only way I can think to partially solve this problem
>>> is to contact an app developer and ask them to test their app with
>>> voice over.  How do you manage the problem if you want to purchase an
>>> app that no one else has tried?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   Cheers
>>>   Maria
>>> 
>>>   sent from mac mini
>>>   email, & fb [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>   skype bubbygirl1972  twitter same as skype without the numbers.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>   On 05/08/2013, at 9:34 AM, David Chittenden <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>       Well, given how few blind people there are, and how few apps we
>>> actually buy compared with sighted people, and considering that this
>>> model would require a complete rewrite and restructuring of the App
>>> Store, I seriously doubt it would happen unless Apple receives a great
>>> many requests for such.
>>> 
>>>       The shareware  model of computer software distribution does
>>> something like this. Save for small companies, shareware is not
>>> usually used because  it does not typically make much money because
>>> people readily and easily crack the protection schemes.
>>> 
>>>       David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>>       Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>       Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>>       Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>       On 05/08/2013, at 11:12, Maria and Joe Chapman
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>           Hi.  I was thinking more along the lines of the app could
>>> be downloaded and is fully functional for a day unless you purchase a
>>> key on the mac or do an in app purchase on the iphone.  Some apps can
>>> be rather expensive, I would not be willing to buy a 10 or 20 dollar
>>> app I could not use and probably wouldn't unless I had heard it was at
>>> least usable in some way with voice over. How many apps I wonder are
>>> not discovered to be accessible because people are afraid to buy them
>>> in case they are not usable?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>           regards
>>>           Maria and crew from australia
>>>           email:
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>           check out
>>> www.95-the-mix.com <http://www.95-the-mix.com>
>>> <http://www.95-the-mix.com/>
>>>           where we play lots of great music
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>           On 05/08/2013, at 9:01 AM, David Chittenden
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>               I would rather not give Apple complete access to my
>>> phone just so they can occasionally check to ensure I am not pirating
>>> apps.
>>> 
>>>               David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
>>>               Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>               Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
>>>               Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>               On 05/08/2013, at 10:41, Maria and Joe Chapman
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>                   HI.  wouldn't it work better if all apps could be
>>> downloaded for free and trialled say for a day? There are lots of apps
>>> I'd love to try but am hesitant to download due to the fact that there
>>> is really no way to tell if they are accessible or not unless someone
>>> on list or someone on applevis has tried them. I mean if it's a 99 c
>>> app it's not that bad but if it's 5 or 10 bucks? That's going to get
>>> expensive.
>>> 
>>>                   Warm regards and blessings
>>>                   Maria, Joe and FurBabies
>>>                   Email:  iMessage:[email protected]
>>> <http://gmail.com> <http://gmail.com/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>                   On 03/08/2013, at 6:02 PM, Arnold Schmidt
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>                       As I state in another message, I would be much
>>> more willing to support a general refund policy, such as Google has,
>>> or at least use to have, rather than an it won't work with VoiceOver
>>> policy.  That is just too open to abuse.   Besides, a general refund
>>> policy would be an even better way to let developers know if people
>>> didn't like their app, a bunch of them all requested refunds.   It
>>> might even improve accessibility.
>>> 
>>>                       Arnold Schmidt
>>> 
>>>                           ----- Original Message -----
>>>                           From: Cara Quinn <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>                           To: [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>                           Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 2:58 AM
>>>                           Subject: Re: Bad experience with iTunes
>>> Store support regarding app refund
>>> 
>>>                           Sieghard and All,
>>> 
>>>                           Let me encourage you and actually everyone
>>> on this list to write Apple Accessibility to request that there be
>>> reasonable accommodation in place for VoiceOver users to receive app
>>> refunds in cases like Sieghard's. I'd also suggest that Sieghard's
>>> note be attached to your own.
>>> 
>>>                           I believe this issue needs to be brought
>>> into the forefront in a positive and decisive way. We are almost 2000
>>> people on this list and this is a very good opportunity to make this
>>> point heard.
>>> 
>>>                           This discussion has come up before of being
>>> alerted of VO accessibility ahead of time in the App Store and though
>>> we've not come to a set conclusion on the best way to do this, having
>>> some indication that an app has been found to be accessible to some
>>> degree with VoiceOver before we purchase it is a completely reasonable
>>> request. If this is not possible, then it is more than reasonable to
>>> ask for refunds if we cannot use an app which is not accessible to us
>>> with the available Apple universal access paradigm.
>>> 
>>>                           the email address for Apple Accessibility is:
>>> 
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> 
>>>                           These are very caring people so please keep
>>> this in mind when you write. I've known some of them personally. They
>>> want to help though there may not be a clear way of making this happen
>>> just yet. Just let them know this is important though. Make your voice
>>> heard in a friendly way. they will listen to you even if they do not
>>> know the best answer yet. :)
>>> 
>>>                           Thanks All, for your time.
>>> 
>>>                           Sincerely,
>>> 
>>>                           Cara :)
>>>                           On Aug 1, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Sieghard
>>> Weitzel <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>                           Hello List,
>>> 
>>>                           Requesting a refund for an app which turns
>>> out not to work with Voiceover has come up a few times and the iTunes
>>> Store support email has been posted in connection with that. So I
>>> thought I post my recent experience with contacting iTunes Store
>>> support via their email.
>>> 
>>>                           I had bought a couple of package tracking
>>> apps in order to find out which one I liked best. I have been using
>>> Track This which is awesome, but I am in Canada and for some reason
>>> they don�t support Purolator and CanPar which are both major carriers
>>> here. I contacted Track This support twice and never received a reply.
>>> 
>>>                           Anyhow, back to iTunes Store support. I
>>> provided all the information including order numbers, purchase date,
>>> my Apple Id etc. I explained how I really enjoyed my iPhone and the
>>> fantastic accessibility, but that unfortunately these two apps I
>>> purchased were not voiceover friendly and there was no Light version
>>> offered which I could have tried first. I also mentioned that I
>>> contacted both developers and after almost a week had not received a
>>> reply. In short, I was friendly, explained everything and even waited
>>> to see if the developers would reply to see if they were willing to
>>> make Voiceover improvements.
>>> 
>>>                           I received a prompt reply in which the
>>> agent explained that all app sales are final, but that given the
>>> situation they would refund me the $6.72 or whatever it was for the 2
>>> apps. However, she also continued to give me links as to their terms
>>> and conditions and said that this was a one-time curtocy and that in
>>> the future they could not provide any more refunds and that it was up
>>> to me to make sure I didn�t turn on one-click ordering and accidently
>>> purchase apps or read the app description to be sure it was what I
>>> wanted. It was strange because all of this gave me the impression this
>>> person did not at all get the point about Voiceover and all that, but
>>> on the other hand she said they would give me a refund given the
>>> situation. According to what she said I should see the refund back on
>>> my account within 48 hours and since both apps were purchased using
>>> store credit it would come back as store credit. This is now 2 weeks
>>> ago and I replied twice to the initial message to explain that I still
>>> had not received the credit and I am getting no more replies.
>>> 
>>>                           I guess what I want to say here is that
>>> those who have done this and received refunds are lucky, but it
>>> appears one should definitely not count on getting a refund even if an
>>> app turns out not to work with Voiceover. I certainly will not buy an
>>> app again thinking I might as well try it because if it doesn�t work I
>>> can always ask for a refund.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone"
>>> Google Group.
>>> 
>>> Post a new message to VIPhone by emailing [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> 
>>> Search and view the VIPhone archives by visiting
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
>>> 
>>> Reach the VIPhone owner and moderators by emailing
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> 
>>> Unsubscribe and leave VIPhone by emailing
>>> [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> 
>>> More VIPhone group options can be found by visiting
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "VIPhone" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone"
>>> Google Group.
>>> 
>>> Post a new message to VIPhone by emailing [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> 
>>> Search and view the VIPhone archives by visiting
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
>>> 
>>> Reach the VIPhone owner and moderators by emailing
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> 
>>> Unsubscribe and leave VIPhone by emailing
>>> [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> 
>>> More VIPhone group options can be found by visiting
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "VIPhone" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> 
>>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone"
>> Google Group.
>> 
>> Post a new message to VIPhone by emailing [email protected].
>> 
>> Search and view the VIPhone archives by visiting
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
>> 
>> Reach the VIPhone owner and moderators by emailing
>> [email protected].
>> 
>> Unsubscribe and leave VIPhone by emailing
>> [email protected].
>> 
>> More VIPhone group options can be found by visiting
>> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "VIPhone" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> an email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Christopher (CJ)
> chaltain at Gmail
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
> Group.
> 
> Post a new message to VIPhone by emailing [email protected].
> 
> Search and view the VIPhone archives by visiting 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.
> 
> Reach the VIPhone owner and moderators by emailing 
> [email protected].
> 
> Unsubscribe and leave VIPhone by emailing 
> [email protected].
> 
> More VIPhone group options can be found by visiting 
> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "VIPhone" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.

Post a new message to VIPhone by emailing [email protected].

Search and view the VIPhone archives by visiting 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/.

Reach the VIPhone owner and moderators by emailing 
[email protected].

Unsubscribe and leave VIPhone by emailing [email protected].

More VIPhone group options can be found by visiting 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to