I agree with your comment about a high voltage (short) at the beginning of the 
reaction in the QX reactor.  It is consistent with the flash of light which can 
be seen at the end of the reactor upon the initial power application.

Your assessment does not address the source of energy during the off phases of 
the control circuit.  I would argue that the reaction producing heat is 
occurring in the Ni electrode with the Li acting as a good convective heat 
transfer agent from the electrode to the outer circumference  of the reactor 
where the water cooling occurs.

The electric current is generated by the net positive charge  that results from 
the reaction that produces energetic alphas that cross the annular space where 
the dusty plasma exists and charge the outer surface of the reactor.

I disagree with Axil that the suncell hydrino reaction is like the QX reaction. 
 The spectra of the two reactions are not reported to be alike.

Bob Cook

From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 10:50:23 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio

The QX is a downsized version of the SunCell with the plasma ball reduced to 
the size of a speck of dust. You can understand what is happening inside the QX 
by looking at what is happening inside the SunCell. The metal used in the QX is 
aluminum whereas the metal used to support the plasma inside the SunCell is 
silver.Lithium is not a reactant and remains in the vapor form. The hydrogen 
pressure is very high because the amount of solid fuel that is placed inside 
the QX must be substantial in order for the fuel loading to be manageable. 
Rossi cannot work with(load) nanograms of fuel

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Bob Higgins 
<rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
In the experiments I am aware of, waveforms were only tried as applied to the 
heater coils (or in my case to a magnetic field coil).  There was no evidence 
of enhanced XH.  This could be because the waveform was not well "coupled" to 
the active medium.  These were heat driven Parkhomov-like experiments.  In the 
case of others that have seen benefit from such waves, the stimulus was applied 
more directly to the reaction medium - electrolysis or to the hydrogenated 
wires.   I believe there could be benefit in such stimuli, but it would have to 
be appropriately coupled to the reaction.

In a conversation I was having with MFMP folks, I had this to say about what I 
thought was described for the QX reactor and power supply:

Since it has been suggested/said that Li is present inside the QX, during a 
discharge it will be in gas phase; and when it is turned OFF, it will condense 
on the inside of the tube and conduct across the electrodes.  Then, upon 
re-start, the tube will be shorted with this condensed Li metal path and a high 
current will be needed to heat the Li to boiling.  Once the Li path evaporates, 
the tube will have to be run in gas discharge mode.  So initially the tube is a 
short and needs a high current, low voltage to begin, and then it has to switch 
into gas discharge mode which is low current high voltage.  Also, in the gas 
discharge mode, the supply will have to be ballasted as a current source.  This 
is why the supply is complex, the waveform is complex, and why it is also 
difficult to characterize what energy has been supplied over time to the tube.  
There is the claim that there is balanced electron/ion flow.  That would be the 
H+ & Li+ positive ions and e- negative electrons conducting bodies.

In a plasma tube, the plasma itself can be at 2700K while the glass itself can 
be kept cool with water cooling.  The heat is transferred by the plasma atoms 
striking the glass, and there will be a cooler gas buffer zone around the 
inside of the glass where it is too cool to be in plasma state - insulating the 
core plasma discharge.  The higher the gas pressure, the more power that must 
be added to the plasma to compensate for the cooling of the glass tube on the 
plasma.  This tells me that the gas pressure inside the QX is probably pretty 
low, probably under 50 torr, and maybe more like 10 torr.  The problem you 
would have is keeping the Li from condensing on the glass tube in that cool 
zone and shorting out the plasma discharge.  It may take care of itself - as 
the lithium condenses on the glass, the plasma will go to it instead of the 
electrodes causing the Li to re-boil (sort of like an arc discharging to a 
piece of metal wire brought into the gap between a spark discharge).

Rossi has not demonstrated that his tube produces XE to any of us.  We 
basically have to take the unreliable, untrustworthy word of a technically 
incompetent scoundrel that he is producing any XE - and on a waveform that 
would be very difficult to characterize by someone that is technically sound.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:31 AM, JonesBeene 
<jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:

Have you (or MFMP) experimented with any variation of the Dardik superwave?

I think it is more than coincidence that Rossi, Brillouin, Kimmel, Energetics 
etc, etc have employed interfering waveforms as the input power.

Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, it is true that his PS seems 
unusually lossy.

Sadly, that is the most hopeful thing that anyone can honestly say about it….

From: Bob Higgins<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>

  *   the demo served no net purpose - except possibly to those there that were 
granted greater access to the data.  You and I should take it as a presumed 
null experiment since there was inadequate data shared to show any XE.

JonesBeene wrote:

  *   The most important Euro Patent from Dardik, El-Boher et al entitled 
"Pulsed low energy nuclear reaction power generators" EP 1656678 B1 with a 
grant date of 2004. This is also known as the "superwave" patent. It is similar 
and precedes the Brillouin IP - and will also rain on the Godes parade, if it 
turns out that structured waveforms are the key to success.

Reply via email to