I like the idea that proton motion in a lattice is considered to entail kinetic
energy. Here is one more mechanism for sharing potential energy of a coherent
system—the lattice of Pd or Ni atoms and all its constituents---with the
potential energy of the system’s EM and gravitational fields coupling the
The non-linearity makes it hard to accept by those old folks not familiar with
the math and calculational schemes used these days to evaluate a multi-bodied
coherent systems, yet seems to imply exact solutions to the QM wave equation.
Rossi’s power supply may be designed to provide EM superwaves that resonate
with the H in the Ni lattice of his QX reactor. (I know that is a stretch for
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 7:24:08 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Rossi dog & pony show with full audio
A known mechanism for wave amplification in rigid structures is called “energy
localization” which can be a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a
lattice. When stimulated with two waveforms at different frequencies, a
paradigm shift can be engineered on the vibrational modes of bound particles
(protons in a lattice). Nuclear reactions can happen in rare cases, but even
without them thermal gain is possible at the nanoscale in blatant violation to
the Laws or Thermodynamics. This is essentially proved but scaling up to useful
levels is not proved.
In the Schrödinger equation you can find the term for quantum kinetic energy as
the second derivative of the wave function for place. The closer the particle
is confined, the greater the curvature of its wave function and the greater is
its quantum kinetic energy (the energy localization). It can be a power law
In simpler terms, Quantum kinetic energy is the kinetic energy with which bound
protons move through the lattice - and this energy can be nonlinear wrt input.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that the closer the particle is
confined, the smaller its freedom of movement Δx and thus - the more violent it
wriggles back and forth, and the greater is his Δp . Intersecting waveforms
can provide the increased confinement and the resultant gain is the theory
behind the “superwave”.
RE: GRANTED US patent which cites the Dardik superwave patent
It is no coincidence that Energetics, Violante, McKubre, Chauvin, Rossi,
Brillouin, Kimmel group, etc, all employed similar interfering and
self-amplifying RF waveforms as input power.
Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, the Euro Patent from Dardik
(El-Boher et al) provides a known mechanism for wave power amplification
-“energy localization” which is a feature of nanoscale packing of hydrogen in a
lattice. Generally the COP is limited to a low range using this mechanism but
it can be gainful without nuclear reactions. It is also difficult to scale up.