Jones wrote: > > One does not necessarily need to believe in the > present objective proof of a crude device like the > Joe-Cell to further investigate what is going on. > Agreed. > > There is the possibility of achieving something > valuable and unique here, in this sub-field which can > be termed as 'eltra-efficient electrolysis' and it may > be drivaive and based roughly on these crude early > designs, but the end product will surely be very > different from any of them. > Hear, Hear. We've seen that already using a series stack of 12 2.75" x 4.5" "magnetic stainless steel" wall plate electrical outlet covers with 1.0 cm spacing (11 cells with 10 floating/neutral plates) up to 0.5 amperes with 9 volts applied to the two end plates giving 0.82 volts per cell.
Lots of gas production with 9.0 * 0.5 = 4.5 watts input. Ideal Electrolysis: Hydrogen production 1.0362E-5 grams per ampere-second. Oxygen Production 8.29E-5 grams per ampere-second. Typical Commercial Electrolyzers: The Electrolabs Cell: 600 amperes at 2.5 volts 34 x 47 x 8.5 inches, 4.8 ft^3 oxygen and 8.9 ft^3 hydrogen per hour. The Knowles Cell: 4 ft long x 2.5 ft wide x 2.5 ft deep 3,000 amperes at 2.25 volts produces 24.2 ft^3 oxygen and 48.4 ft^3 hydrogen per hour. High Pressure Electrolyzer (Germany): 10 ft^3 Hydrogen per kilowatt-hour. (5.57E-3 lb per ft^3) = 18 KW-Hr/LB. Fred > > Jones
