On Aug 1, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Jeff Fink wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 12:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: The Abduction Paradigm
But Jeff, artifacts do exist. They have been seen by people and
described in detail. Granted, you are not allowed to see them, but is
that required for you to believe?
That would really help>
In addition, the abductees describe
conditions in the space crafts and instruments used for examination
that are in many cases identical even though this information is not
generally known and the various abductees never talked to each other.
Of course, it would be simple to plant coordinated visions in multiple
people. It would be the most effective strategy they have to gain
believers.
Who is doing this planting of coordinated vision? Who wants us to
believe in aliens? The government is doing everything it can to kill
this belief.
In addition, physical evidence in the form of changes in soil
properties and indentations where the craft landed have been described
in detail. Although the aliens are well ahead of us in science, we do
not need to explain their existence by using excessive imagination, as
I think you have done.
As for the universe being empty of life except ours, this is simply
not a rational possibility. The earth is a late comer to the
universe. We should expect life that formed on older planets than ours
to be more advanced.
Then why are we not being contacted by real aliens?
This is a strange circular question. The UFO experience and the crop
circles show that we are being contacted. But you reject this
evidence and you wonder why the evidence is not of a kind you would
accept.
Frankly, if I were an alien visitor, I would not want the natives,
especially the crazy ones, to be certain of my existence. I would try
to keep the natives confused while I went about my business in plain
sight.
Ed
Jeff
