Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I have no idea what Galantini is expert in. Do you know?
Yes. The second test proved beyond any doubt that he is an expert in identifying dry steam, and it proved that all of the objections raised here are bunk, including yours.
In science, you are supposed to answer questions by doing another experiment, and measuring the effect with a different method. That eliminates the possibility that the first method was mistaken. That's what Rossi did. So there is nothing more to talk about, unless you believe (as some people apparently do) that he measured the temperature and flow rates wrong by some large factor (up to a factor of a 1000 according to some). I don't believe that.
- Jed
