The charts I am referring to indicated that the input power was being used to only joule heat the inactive wire while the active one was just nearby sharing the central region. There is no reason to expect that a standard nichrome wire would exhibit large power excursions when driven to a modest temperature. I am confident that Celani can eliminate this possibility quickly.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Arnaud Kodeck <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 1:24 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Progress from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (Celani replication) Celani doesn't give us the current and voltage of its wires (heating or active wires). It might be interresting to see if there are some variability. If the resistance shows some varaitions (as said in the Celani's report of August), it must have also variations in current/voltage. Those variations impact the power supplied. In the celani's report, power is constant over time without a subtle variation ! Arnaud From: David Roberson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: lundi 8 octobre 2012 18:38 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Progress from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (Celani replication) In my opinion there is little doubt that LENR activity is taking place within Celani's demonstration. I base this belief upon the shape of the waveforms published by the group where the excess power versus time shows a remarkable amount of variability. I pointed out before that the power was clearly being emitted in impulse form that was subsequently filtered by the time constants associated with the system. This behavior is typical of a multitude of positive feedback oscillations that originate within many small regions of the active wire. And, since the power was being applied to the inactive wire during this period one can conclude that the impulses were not due to thermal feedback affecting the current flow within the active wire. If we were observing the same behavior when power was being applied to the active wire one might conclude that some form of thermal run away was causing the large variations in emitted energy. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Akira Shirakawa <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Oct 8, 2012 3:31 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Progress from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project (Celani replication) On 2012-10-08 01:55, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Today I was in touch with Celani and some others in this project. They > are cooperating, planning together, and exchanging information. That is > excellent news. [...] Yes; furthermore, it looks like the have many connections with reputable individuals and organizations, so that if validated, this technology will gain public awareness very quickly. I hope that as soon as they successfully exactly replicate Celani's cell they will move onto an improved version for flow calorimetry testing paired with a blank run, so that there will be no room for doubt anymore (there still is the chance this could be an artifact due to unexpected but well-established physical phenomena affecting measurements). Cheers, S.A.
