More of Black EVs http://www.svn.net/krscfs/Permittivity%20Transitions.pdf
Figure 5 and 6 on page 4 show how a white EV transforms into a black EV. Ken Shoulders states as follows: *In order to develop some reality about the appearance of white and black EVs, refer to Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 with each showing a single run of an EV toward a target at the top of the photo. These photos were taken from (1) as Fig. 4:40 and Fig. 4:42 where there is other photos showing similar affects. What can be seen is the white EV coming in from the lower side of the photo and then disappearing from camera view just before striking the target and disintegrating it. The white glob at the top is a plume of ions coming from the explosion. * *This can be validated by applying an analyzing field in the camera that produces a deflection to the left for ions and to the right for electrons. This analysis field has been applied in Fig. 6 and it can be seen that the white EV has moved to the right, signifying its emission products are electrons, while the ion plume moves to the left. The fact is, there is an omission of both electronic and optical traces during the black phase of the EV run. * ** *This is not an artifact of the measurement method because there are many examples where multiple cameras and visual observation showed such a disappearance.* *In the black state, there is no ability to ionize gas or to excite fluorescence from the nearby dielectric materials whereas there is with a white EV.* *As an aside, the question of fractional electronic charge becomes moot under the conditions discussed here. Although there are too many electrons in the process to determine a single electron level for a quantum check, it appears that there are many states of charge expression as the transition from white to black is made. * *Some of these could be like fractional charges in appearance. There are no obvious consequences of this affect.* *Unidirectional Current Flow:* *Under the conditions of white and black EV looping as stated above, there is an electrical peculiarity worth noting. The current flows in only the white EV direction thus giving the basic conditions for magnetic field generation without closing the current loop. The return charge flows around the other half of the loop without being registered in our instruments. This might be the basis for predicting something like a magnetic monopole.* *Under the conditions stated, it is possible to detect the vector potential, Ā, outside of the current loop usually used to define the vector potential habitat. This offers a communication method that is not shielded by conventional conductors because the electrons in the conductor are not excited into generating a mirror image. One must wonder what other electrons we are working with are also not excited by this unusual method of generating longitudinal emanations or potentials.* The black EV is produced by polariton creation. Of note Soulders states: *In the black state, there is no ability to ionize gas or to excite fluorescence from the nearby dielectric materials whereas there is with a white EV.* * >From figure 5, it can be seen that the condensed vapors of the metal target take some short time to form nano-particles.* In the Black EV state electrons are converted to polaritons when the electrons of the white EV, the infrared EMF from the spark discharge, and the condensed nano-particle combined to form these polaritons. The infrared radiation of the spark explosion helps produce the polariton plume through the action of Fano interference. Shoulders remarks: *The fact is, there is an omission of both electronic and optical traces during the black phase of the EV run.* *Under the conditions of white and black EV looping as stated above, there is an electrical peculiarity worth noting.* *The current flows in only the white EV direction thus giving the basic conditions for magnetic field generation without closing the current loop. The return charge flows around the other half of the loop without being registered in our instruments. This might be the basis for predicting something like a magnetic monopole.* No. this results from polariton production, Ken. On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The kinetic energy of an electron or group of electrons cannot match or > exceed the power of hot fusion devices like ITER or the national fusion > facility. > > The answer is not to be found in kinetic energy or the related > relativistic speed of electrons. > > An arching electron will produce nano-particles when it deposits it > kenetic energy on a metal surface. > > I believe that the dark modes seen in Ken Shoulders sees in his > experiments are due to nano-particle generation when metal is vaporized by > the kinetic energy of electrons. > > Ken Shoulders states as follows: > > > The EV makes a streak of light as it travels across the surface of the > dielectric, and imparts a localized surface charge. Unless this charge is > dispersed, it will cause the next EV to follow another path. A witness > plate of metal foil may be positioned to intercept the EVs, and will > sustain visible damage from their impact. The foil thus serves to detect > and locate the entities even if they are invisible ("black EVs"). > > > Black EVs are produced by Fano resonance of nano-particles produced by the > condensation of metal vapor in concert with light radiation produced by > the EV. > > > Polaritons are thereby formed to resolve the EMF discharge into dark modes > of EMF radiation. > > Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering act in concert with Fano resonance > to turn the EMF of the spark inward into a local EMF focus where charge > concentration is manifest. > > Figure 18 in this reference shows micro/nano particle production > > http://www.svn.net/krscfs/Charge%20Clusters%20In%20Action.pdf > > Nuclear transmutation is shown in figure 19. > > Notice that almost all of the transmutation is caused by fission. > > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:40 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ed, >> >> Thanks for your reply. >> >> Your statement may be correct. >> >> I am looking for overlooked explanations for paradoxical LENR experiments. >> >> The Feynman Lecture reference I cited at the start of this thread shows >> that electrons in electric arcs can pick up significant linear momentum as >> current is interrupted. Due to their small mass, this extra momentum can >> give electrons a relativistic increase in kinetic energy, and so more >> mass. >> >> >> This quite counter-intuitive, since kinetic energy is normally defined >> in terms of velocity. High kinetic energy particles normally move >> - fast. However, because the electron momentum is defined by a >> differential >> operator, an immobile electron wave packet can gain kinetic energy by >> becoming more localized, and having a more oscillatory envelop. >> >> Perhaps this happens when an arcing electron collides with a proton, >> deuteron or triton which experiences an equal, opposite momentum 'kick' >> as the current stops. >> >> The deuteron and triton have obvious structure. The proton does also >> since >> it is a 'quark bag'. Possibly this structure is enough to trap an >> immobile (lab frame) colliding electron whose momentum is ramping up. >> K-shell electron capture is another conjecture. >> >> I checked my math. I think it is correct. >> >> This is also related to "hidden" field momentum, which manifests itself in >> the "Feynman disk/cylinder (pseudo-)paradoxes." >> >> I believe that a similar analysis can be done for strong local transient >> coulomb forces in plasmons. >> >> All just a waste of time, if there really are no LENR transmutations, tho. >> >> -- Lou Pagnucco >> >> >> > Lou, most experiments apply no extra energy other than temperature or >> > electric current. We know that the level of temperature and current >> > used do not and cannot initiate a nuclear reaction. Something else is >> > important. Yes, small local variations in energy might occur, but >> > these are not even close to what is required to initiate a nuclear >> > reaction. We are discussing the LENR effect here, not whether small >> > variations in energy might occur in a material based on some novel >> > process. That subject requires a different discussion. >> > >> > Even when high energy is applied on purpose, such as by using ion >> > bombardment, the energy required to get the observed rates is many >> > thousands of eV and the result is hot fusion, not cold fusion. >> > Consequently, we now know that energy cannot be spontaneously >> > concentrated enough to cause the observed rates and if it were >> > concentrated, the result would be only hot fusion. >> > >> > People keep trying to suggest minor processes that are observed to >> > occur in materials under conditions that have no relationship to cold >> > fusion. These discussion, while interesting and I'm sure informative, >> > are not related to the subject at hand. If you want to understand CF, >> > you need to focus on what is known about CF. >> > >> > We know that energy cannot spontaneously concentrate to levels >> > required to initiate a nuclear reaction. We know that when energy is >> > applied at the required level, hot fusion results, not cold fusion. >> > Nevertheless, modest extra energy applied to when LENR is already >> > occuring does increase the rate. This means the extra energy is not >> > required to initiate the process, but affects some aspect of the >> > process already in progress, such as diffusion. You need to explore >> > how energy might affect the process, not how it might start the process. >> > >> > Ed Storms >> > [...] >> >> >
